Your message dated Sun, 28 May 2017 21:00:21 +0900
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line WEBLATE
has caused the Debian Bug report #855179,
regarding debian-reference-it: Disable Weblate for currently .po and git 
maintaned Italian translation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
855179: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855179
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-reference-it
Version: 2.64
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

I am (was? since I am not the Last-Translator) the current Italian
translator of the Debian Reference. I always kept it up to date (to
the best of my capabilities, of course).

I saw that a recent change was made via Weblate (changing the
translator assignement, as I said).

I always assumed that Weblate was enabled only for those languages who
did not have an official translator in the Debian project.

In the past I sent my translations for review in the
debian-l10n-italian mailing list the first time and for any major
change. And I did commit my translations.

I understand that translation, like everything else in Debian, is a
community work. But as a wishlist I would like to ask to enable
Weblate only for those languages that don't have an official/active
translator; or at least to disable it for those languages that have an
active translator and request it.

I feel that translation needs consistency and review, when possible
(think of a scenario where everyone was able to do NMU on every
package...I think every developer would be very wary of such a situation).

In my case, I feel like I would have to either recheck every change
made or abandon a translation that I worked a lot on (the Debian
Reference is quite a big document) but that I can not guarantee the
quality of (even if possibly the quality of the Weblate one would be
better than mine).

Moreover being noted as the Last-Translator in the .po header, I
always replied to any call for update or any other request of
information/correction. So I think that having someone in the
Last-Translator field who is officially responsible of a translation
is a plus. The same is true for the Language Team header that was
changed from "Italian <[email protected]>" to
"Italian
<https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/debian-reference/translations/it/>". I
have no idea if/where the Weblate Italian team is reachable (hopefully
mails would ge redirected to the correct debian-l10n-<language> team.

This is just a general wishlist based on my past experience with
Weblate; it has nothing to do specifically with the person or the
quality of the recent change (1 string, correct as far as I can see)
made via Weblate to the Italian translation.

I put on CC the debian-i18n mailing list because I see that
translation are moving more and more towards Weblate and I would like
to point out this side of having an uncontrolled/unreviewed source for
Debian translations. I apologize for the noise if the CC was out of place.

Thanks,

Beatrice

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

Now that [email protected] is controlling commit from weblate to alioth,
I see this problem solved.

Osamu

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to