Your message dated Sat, 04 Mar 2006 10:55:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#307131: New version of glpk breaks previously working code. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---Package: glpk Version: 4.8-1 Severity: important I had a piece of code that has been working with GLPK quite happily for some time. Today I had to make a slight change to my code and found that it no longer compiles. Here are the error messages: calc.c:264: warning: implicit declaration of function `lpx_set_col_coef' calc.c:302: warning: implicit declaration of function `lpx_load_mat' It seems that my system (the Testing verison of Debin GNU/Linux) has recently updated my system from glpk-4.7 to glpk-4.8 and that caused my code to break. Please provide a separate versions of the library to avoid breakage of previously working code. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (650, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to POSIX) Versions of packages glpk depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi, the API change occurred between 4.3 and 4.4. By now, 4.8 is in stable, so it probably isn't sensible anymore to maintain compatibility with 4.3. (It most likely never was, because it means a lot of work without support from upstream, and probably helps only a small number of people.) Brady, you mentioned a while ago you might write documentation for people on how to adapt their source. Did you get around to doing so? It would be a good thing to include this. -- Falk
--- End Message ---
