Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 00:20:52 +0100
with message-id <c9f6d12b-f83e-62bd-71c5-e6bd8747f...@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#866303: guidedog: maintainer script(s) not using 
strict mode
has caused the Debian Bug report #866303,
regarding guidedog: maintainer script(s) not using strict mode
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
866303: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866303
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: guidedog
Version: 1.2.0-3+b1
Severity: normal
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: colis-shparser

Dear maintainer,

at least one of the maintainer scripts (preinst, postinst, prerm,
postrm) of the package guidedog does not use strict mode. Policy
section 10.4 says:

"Shell scripts (sh and bash) [..] should almost certainly start with
set -e so that errors are detected."

"Every script should use set -e or check the exit status of every
command."

Please insert a "set -e" at the beginning of your script to enable
strict mode. You should not replace this by a first line "#!/bin/sh
-e" as it is not effective when your script is executed by an
explicit invocation of sh.

Note that this might make your script fail in cases where it did not
fail before. This is the purpose of strict mode - make it fail when
any unexpected error is encountered. You should make sure that you
catch any error (non-zero exit codes of commands) that you decide to
tolerate. Techniques to locally catch an error include using
appropriate options to your command when available, adding a " ||
true" at the end of the command, or selectively switching off strict
mode by "set +e" and switching it back on again later by "set -e". 

This bug filing has been discussed and approved in thread [1].

-Ralf.

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/06/msg00342.html 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

This bug has been fixed.

Thank you

-----------------------------------------
Antonio Cardoso Martins
        digiplan...@gmail.com
        antonio.mart...@sectra.com
Homepage: http://digiplan.eu.org
Linkedin: http://pt.linkedin.com/in/digiplan
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/digiplan.pt
-----------------------------------------

On 28-06-2017 20:02, trei...@debian.org wrote:
> Package: guidedog
> Version: 1.2.0-3+b1
> Severity: normal
> User: trei...@debian.org
> Usertags: colis-shparser
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> at least one of the maintainer scripts (preinst, postinst, prerm,
> postrm) of the package guidedog does not use strict mode. Policy
> section 10.4 says:
>
> "Shell scripts (sh and bash) [..] should almost certainly start with
> set -e so that errors are detected."
>
> "Every script should use set -e or check the exit status of every
> command."
>
> Please insert a "set -e" at the beginning of your script to enable
> strict mode. You should not replace this by a first line "#!/bin/sh
> -e" as it is not effective when your script is executed by an
> explicit invocation of sh.
>
> Note that this might make your script fail in cases where it did not
> fail before. This is the purpose of strict mode - make it fail when
> any unexpected error is encountered. You should make sure that you
> catch any error (non-zero exit codes of commands) that you decide to
> tolerate. Techniques to locally catch an error include using
> appropriate options to your command when available, adding a " ||
> true" at the end of the command, or selectively switching off strict
> mode by "set +e" and switching it back on again later by "set -e". 
>
> This bug filing has been discussed and approved in thread [1].
>
> -Ralf.
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/06/msg00342.html 
>

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to