Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 14:03:32 +0100 with message-id <20170806130332.n4tsvcplph3gd...@powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#869854: nmu: restbed-4.0~dfsg1-4 on armel has caused the Debian Bug report #869854, regarding nmu: restbed-4.0~dfsg1-4 on armel to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 869854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=869854 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello, It looks like it was restbed rebuilt on all architectures except armel. Ring,which depends on restbed, fails to build on armel. I could reproduce the build failure on a porter box. Then I rebuilt restbed and it solved the issue. This is my first time doing this: nmu restbed-4.0~dfsg1-4 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ssl1.1' Cheers <3 -- Alexandre Viau av...@debian.org
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 02:10:24AM -0400, Alexandre Viau wrote: > It looks like it was restbed rebuilt on all architectures except armel. > Ring,which depends on restbed, fails to build on armel. I could > reproduce the build failure on a porter box. Then I rebuilt restbed and > it solved the issue. > > This is my first time doing this: > > nmu restbed-4.0~dfsg1-4 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ssl1.1' I don't think this is related to libssl1.1 - restbed on armel already depends on it. The version skew is because it was previously not building on armel, and 42 days ago it did start to build (versus 231 days for the other arches). So it was not necessary to rebuild on armel for libssl1.1. However, since your testing clearly shows a rebuild fixing the problem, I've scheduled that. I suspect some other change further up the dependencies. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
--- End Message ---