Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 17:28:37 +0200 with message-id <20170806152837.4kinjaybjbh6jgyj@fama> and subject line please don't remove pisa and trac-wikiprint from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #870978, regarding trac-wikiprint: should trac-wikiprint be removed from unstable? to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 870978: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870978 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: trac-wikiprint User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch Hi, Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from unstable, because: it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze but wasn't part of stretch AND it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze but it wasn't part of jessie AND it is still not in testing AND it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017. If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel free to just close this bug. If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be turned into a removal request, using: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org retitle -1 RM: trac-wikiprint -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch thanks - Lucas, for the QA team. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Thanks!signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---