Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:22:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: Please use gcrypt11/gnutls11 instead of gcrypt1/gnutls7, if possible
Package: ggz-grubby
Severity: important
'ggz-grubby' depends on gcrypt1 or gnutls7.
These packages are old, no longer supported by Upstream, and contain
serious deficiencies / bugs. See [0] and followup emails, and [1] for
further details.
(These are about gcrypt7 and gnutls10, but the same reasoning applies.)
Therefore, we want to get rid of gcrypt1 and gnutls7 in Sarge, if possible.
Please check whether you can easily replace those libraries in your package.
Thank you.
NB: If ggz-grubby doesn't itself build-depend on gcrypt1 or gnutls7,
you can fix the problem by either updating your package's copy of
libtool (best), or build-depending on newer versions of those libraries
which pull in the dependency on gcrypt1 or gnutls7 (acceptable).
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/07/msg00075.html
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/258975
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
See #279761.
--- End Message ---
