Your message dated Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:50:39 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#872122: augeas: fdisk build-dependency needed (for 
tests)
has caused the Debian Bug report #872122,
regarding augeas: fdisk build-dependency needed (for tests)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
872122: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872122
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: augeas
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: important
User: [email protected]
Usertags: fdisk-build-dependency

Hello,

As recently announced on debian-devel-announce[1] packages who need
any of sfdisk, cfdisk or fdisk will need to add a dependency on the
new fdisk package.

Your package augeas showed up on codesearch.debian.net and a very
quick analysis suggested you might want to add a build-dependency as
your package only seems to use things from the fdisk package in its
test-suite.

Please use the backwards-compatible way of specifying the
build-dependency as suggested in the debian-devel-announce mail:

fdisk <!nocheck> | util-linux (<< 2.29.2-3~) <!nocheck>

If your more detailed analysis shows this should not be needed then
please just close this bug report stating the results of your
analysis (and if so sorry for bothering you).

Regards, Andreas Henriksson

[1]:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/08/msg00005.html 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
* [email protected]:

> Your package augeas showed up on codesearch.debian.net and a very
> quick analysis suggested you might want to add a build-dependency as
> your package only seems to use things from the fdisk package in its
> test-suite.

No, this is a false positive. The only match I find by grepping through
the sources is an entry in test/root/etc/sudoers. Nowhere is sfdisk,
cfdisk or fdisk actually executed or otherwise used.

Closing this bug.

Thanks.
-Hilko

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to