Your message dated Sun, 27 Aug 2017 18:28:45 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#872781: mediagoblin: empty mediagoblin package?
has caused the Debian Bug report #872781,
regarding mediagoblin: empty mediagoblin package?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
872781: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872781
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mediagoblin
Version: 0.9.0~dfsg-1~exp1
Severity: normal

Hi.

I was excited to see that we had mediagoblin accepted in our archive, since
I want to use it for my personal media.

Unfortunately, right after installing it, I have not found any easy way of
running it and the mediagoblin package apparently only pulls the
dependencies... And it only contains documentation, being, otherwise, an
empty package.

Is this correct/expected?


Thanks for packaging mediagoblin anyway,

Rogério Brito.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable'), (150, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages mediagoblin depends on:
ii  python3-alembic       0.8.8-3
ii  python3-babel         2.4.0+dfsg.1-2
ii  python3-bcrypt        3.1.3-1
ii  python3-celery        3.1.23-7
ii  python3-configobj     5.0.6-2
ii  python3-dateutil      2.6.0-1
ii  python3-exif          2.1.2-1
ii  python3-itsdangerous  0.24+dfsg1-2
ii  python3-jinja2        2.9.6-1
ii  python3-jsonschema    2.5.1-6
ii  python3-kombu         4.0.2+really3.0.35+dfsg-2
ii  python3-lxml          3.8.0-1+b1
ii  python3-markdown      2.6.8-1
ii  python3-oauthlib      2.0.1-1
ii  python3-pastedeploy   1.5.2-4
ii  python3-pil           4.2.1-1
ii  python3-pyld          0.6.8-1
ii  python3-pytest        3.2.1-1
ii  python3-pytest-xdist  1.18.2-1
ii  python3-requests      2.18.1-1
ii  python3-six           1.10.0-4
ii  python3-sphinx        1.5.6-2
ii  python3-sqlalchemy    1.1.11+ds1-1
ii  python3-tz            2017.2-2
ii  python3-unidecode     0.04.19-1
ii  python3-waitress      1.0.1-1
ii  python3-webtest       2.0.27-1
ii  python3-werkzeug      0.12.2+dfsg1-2
ii  python3-wtforms       2.1-1

Versions of packages mediagoblin recommends:
ii  fonts-inconsolata                          001.010-5
ii  fonts-lato                                 2.0-2
ii  libjs-jquery                               3.1.1-2
ii  libjs-leaflet                              0.7.7+20160312-1
ii  libjs-pdf                                  1.5.188+dfsg-1
ii  postgresql-client                          9.6+184
ii  postgresql-client-9.6 [postgresql-client]  9.6.3-4+b1

Versions of packages mediagoblin suggests:
pn  mediagoblin-doc  <none>
ii  python-nose      1.3.7-2

-- no debconf information

-- 
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFCAAAA
http://cynic.cc/blog/ : github.com/rbrito : profiles.google.com/rbrito
DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.0~dfsg-1~exp2

Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2017-08-21 10:40:48)
> Quoting Rogério Brito (2017-08-21 10:22:49)
> > I was excited to see that we had mediagoblin accepted in our 
> > archive, since I want to use it for my personal media.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, right after installing it, I have not found any easy 
> > way of running it and the mediagoblin package apparently only pulls 
> > the dependencies... And it only contains documentation, being, 
> > otherwise, an empty package.
> > 
> > Is this correct/expected?
> 
> Yes, it is released to experimental because it is not yet usable.
> 
> Furthermore I messed up the git sources so was unable to release 
> improved packages until it was approved from ftpmaster.  What I have 
> prepared (and hopefully find time to release today) is more complete 
> but still has a lot of loose ends.

Package is no longer empty - but still unfinished so still released to 
experimental only for now.  Therefore closing this bugreport.


> You are quite welcome to join me in maintaining mediagoblin - but if 
> you want to just work then wait until it gets released to unstable.

Help maintaining the package is still highly appreciated.  Sharing your 
experiences with the experimental packaging is help! :-)


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to