Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:40:50 -0400
with message-id
<cab4xwxwqyv_y-x5-rvskdjnba0ssqwqknh3bjjs6zjp22gj...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#873248: astroid: please rename source package e.g. to
python-astroid
has caused the Debian Bug report #873248,
regarding astroid: please rename source package e.g. to python-astroid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
873248: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873248
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: astroid
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I am preparing a new Debian package which has the upstream project name
"Astroid" and provides the binary "astroid".
None of that collides with src:astroid, but Adrian Bunk kindly warned
(see bug#873202) that our bugtracker gets easily confused when a
source package exist and also a binary package by same name but
belonging to different source package.
I therefore suggest that src:python be renamed to avoid confusion.
- Jonas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=y5/r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
control: tags -1 +wontfix
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> wrote:
> Package: astroid
> Severity: normal
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi,
>
> I am preparing a new Debian package which has the upstream project name
> "Astroid" and provides the binary "astroid".
>
> None of that collides with src:astroid, but Adrian Bunk kindly warned
> (see bug#873202) that our bugtracker gets easily confused when a
> source package exist and also a binary package by same name but
> belonging to different source package.
yes, i already received a bug for astroidmail
> I therefore suggest that src:python be renamed to avoid confusion.
No. the upstream project is called `astroid`, it arrived first in
debian and its first release (1.0) was in 2013, while astroidmail 0.1
was in 2014. src:astroid clearly predates astroidmail, so why dont you
call your new package something different and avoid confusion? too
late, you already uploaded it...
--
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi
--- End Message ---
