Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:19:11 +0200
with message-id
<1508671151.815349.1146906880.773a8...@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line Closing bugs in old-old-stable bind9 versions
has caused the Debian Bug report #172311,
regarding Have init script wait until named is ready to process requests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
172311: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=172311
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dhcp3-relay
Version: 3.0+3.0.1rc9-2 (not installed)
Severity: important
/etc/rc2.d/S20dhcp3-relay gets started an incredibly short amount of
time after /etc/rc2.d/S20bind9. If the DHCP server specified for
dhcrelay3 is a hostname (as allowed in dhcrelay(8)) and the machine is
using its own DNS server, the DNS server might not be available by the
time dhcrelay3 tries to query it.
In the following excerpt from /var/log/daemon.log, this situation can
be fairly clearly seen (once you realise that "dhcp" is a CNAME for
the machine that is our DHCP server :-):
Dec 7 11:21:20 haven named[2028]: starting BIND 9.2.1
Dec 7 11:21:20 haven named[2028]: using 1 CPU
Dec 7 11:21:20 haven dhcrelay: dhcp: host unknown
Dec 7 11:21:20 haven dhcrelay: Usage: dhcrelay [-p <port>] [-d] [-D] [-i
interface] [-q] [-a] [-A length] [-m
append|replace|forward|discard] [server1 [... serverN]]
Dec 7 11:21:20 haven named[2033]: loading configuration from
'/etc/bind/named.conf'
Dec 7 11:21:21 haven named[2033]: no IPv6 interfaces found
Dec 7 11:21:21 haven named[2033]: listening on IPv4 interface lo, 127.0.0.1#53
I can't think of a reason for starting dhcrelay3 so early in the boot
sequence. Could it be pushed back so it starts a little later?
Perhaps backgrounding it with a hacky little sleep?
Thanks...
peace & happiness,
martin
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3
Hi,
the bind9 bug list grew too much and the Debian BIND team cannot
simply test all the reported bugs against versions not in stable, so
this is mass bug close, as either the version is no longer relevant
(because of old-old-stable 9.8.x or old-stable 9.9.5 or even older
version of bind9) or the bug was already fixed.
However, if you can reproduce the bug with a current version in stable,
please use Debian BTS 'found <bug> <version_you_reproduced_the_issue>'
command to retag the bug and reopen it.
Cheers,
Ondrej
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
