Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:19:11 +0200
with message-id
<1508671151.815349.1146906880.773a8...@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line Closing bugs in old-old-stable bind9 versions
has caused the Debian Bug report #208696,
regarding Could some files from bind-doc be included in bind9-doc?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
208696: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=208696
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bind9-doc
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-04
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
=-==-=
There are many very good guides, FAQs and documents in the bind-doc package
that I've been missing in the new bind9-doc package. Are they intentionally
left out and placed only in the bind-doc? The bind-doc package, according to
the version number, belongs the the 8.x version of BIND so if I have version
9.x of BIND installed I wouldn't normally want to install the older version
of the documentation. But there is a lot of good literature in the bind-doc
that applies to both versions of BIND and probably many users that don't
know the bind-doc package well would miss it as I did.
Honestly, I am not sure what would be the best. Maybe it is not such a good
idea to include the same file in multiple packages. Probably it would be
sufficient to make bind9-doc to recommend (or suggest) the bind-doc package.
Anyway, these are just my opinions, I don't know if anyone else shares them
with me in the same way ;)
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Peter
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3
Hi,
the bind9 bug list grew too much and the Debian BIND team cannot
simply test all the reported bugs against versions not in stable, so
this is mass bug close, as either the version is no longer relevant
(because of old-old-stable 9.8.x or old-stable 9.9.5 or even older
version of bind9) or the bug was already fixed.
However, if you can reproduce the bug with a current version in stable,
please use Debian BTS 'found <bug> <version_you_reproduced_the_issue>'
command to retag the bug and reopen it.
Cheers,
Ondrej
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
