Your message dated Tue, 13 Mar 2018 20:11:37 +0100
with message-id <20180313191136.gk22...@mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#892832: ftp.debian.org: arbitrarily rejects packages 
and doesn't allow reupload
has caused the Debian Bug report #892832,
regarding ftp.debian.org: arbitrarily rejects packages and doesn't allow 
reupload
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
892832: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: important


Hi ftp-gurus,

I am not sure what part of the whole system is just messed up, but it
is. Today I uploaded texlive-{base,lang,extra,bin} and biber, all in the
same dput call.

All packages but texlive-lang were accepted.

texlive-lang was cryptically rejected because whoever claimed that 
texlive-lang-japanese was missing, which wasn't. At least dput told me
that it did upload it.

Then, after a few hours, I re-uploaded texlive-lang, only to get a very
helpful message that I have to change the timestamp of the package for
reupload.

I refrain from uttering my opinion, but I expect that I can upload a
package that has not been accepted into Debian, and that the timestamp
should not be a limiting factor.

Besides that, it would be nice to see why on earth dput was happily
uploading the packages, but whatever super program is running on the
other side decided to ignore texlive-lang-japanese.

Thanks

Norbert

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 04:03:19PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > texlive-lang was cryptically rejected because whoever claimed that 
> > texlive-lang-japanese was missing, which wasn't. At least dput told me
> > that it did upload it.
> 
> Please report the *exact* error message, together with your .changes
> and .dsc (if any).  Without it's pretty useless for anybody to speculate
> what went wrong.
> If I had to speculate on something it would be about Packages-List not
> containing the package, but who knows.

I see you managed to upload it
https://tracker.debian.org/news/939951

So, I'm closing this bug.

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to