Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2018 15:28:30 +0000
with message-id <e1f5yic-0004sf...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#892426: fixed in pocl 1.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #892426,
regarding pocl: FTBFS on most non-x86 architectures: 12-16% of tests pass
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
892426: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892426
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pocl
Version: 1.1~rc2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
User: debian-m...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: mips mips64el mipsel

Builds of pocl for most non-x86 architectures, including several
release architectures, failed with heavy test suite errors: between
12% and 16% of tests passed, depending on the architecture [1].  The
only exceptions are arm64, which succeeded, and armhf, on which 43% of
tests passed [2] -- still not great, but better.

More specifically, the failures in question occurred on armel, mips,
mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x, and the non-release architectures
powerpc, ppc64, and sparc64.  94 tests failed identically on all nine
of these architectures, as detailed below.  In addition, some tests
failed on only a subset of architectures:

  25 - kernel/test_shuffle_half (Failed): armel
  46/47 - regression/infinite_loop_REPL (Failed): sparc64
  60/61 - regression/infinite_loop_LOOPS (Failed): sparc64
  67/68 - regression/passing_a_constant_array_as_an_arg (Failed): sparc64
  79/80 - runtime/test_event_cycle (Failed): powerpc
  83/84 - runtime/clCreateKernel (Failed): sparc64
  84/85 - runtime/clGetKernelArgInfo (Failed): sparc64
  113/114 - examples/example1_dot_product (Child aborted): all but sparc64
  114/115 - examples/example2_matrix_transpose (Child aborted): all but sparc64
  115/116 - examples/example2_matrix_transpose_alocals (Child aborted): all but 
sparc64
  116/117 - poclcc (Child aborted): all but sparc64
  118/119 - examples/trig (Child aborted): all but sparc64
  119/120 - EinsteinToolkit (Child aborted): all but mips*
  120/121 - EinsteinToolkit_SubDev (Child aborted): all but mips*

NB: Test numbers vary somewhat because kernel/test_shuffle_half is #25
on armel and does not exist on the other eight affected architectures.

Could you please take a look?

Thanks!

[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=pocl&ver=1.1%7Erc2-1
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888063

Here's the list of tests that failed on all nine of these architectures:

2 - kernel/test_as_type (Failed)
3 - kernel/test_convert_type_1 (Failed)
4 - kernel/test_convert_type_2 (Failed)
5 - kernel/test_convert_type_4 (Failed)
6 - kernel/test_convert_type_8 (Failed)
7 - kernel/test_convert_type_16 (Failed)
8 - kernel/test_bitselect (Failed)
9 - kernel/test_hadd_loopvec (Failed)
10 - kernel/test_hadd_loops (Failed)
11 - kernel/test_min_max (Failed)
12 - kernel/test_length_distance (Failed)
13 - kernel/test_fmin_fmax_fma (Failed)
14 - kernel/test_convert_sat_regression (Failed)
15 - kernel/test_rotate (Failed)
16 - kernel/test_fabs (Failed)
17 - kernel/test_short16 (Failed)
18 - kernel/test_frexp_modf (Failed)
19 - kernel/test_local_struct_array (Failed)
20 - kernel/test_sampler_address_clamp (Failed)
21 - kernel/test_image_query_funcs (Failed)
22 - kernel/test_shuffle_char (Failed)
23 - kernel/test_shuffle_short (Failed)
24 - kernel/test_shuffle_ushort (Failed)
26/27 - kernel/test_shuffle_uint (Failed)
27/28 - kernel/test_shuffle_float (Failed)
28/29 - kernel/test_shuffle_long (Failed)
29/30 - kernel/test_shuffle_ulong (Failed)
30/31 - kernel/test_shuffle_double (Failed)
31/32 - kernel/test_printf (Failed)
32/33 - kernel/test_sizeof_uint (Failed)
33/34 - regression/test_issue_231 (Failed)
34/35 - regression/test_issue_445 (Failed)
35/36 - regression/test_issue_553 (Failed)
37/38 - regression/phi_nodes_not_replicated_REPL (Failed)
38/39 - regression/issues_with_local_pointers_REPL (Failed)
39/40 - regression/barrier_between_two_for_loops_REPL (Failed)
40/41 - regression/simple_for-loop_with_a_barrier_inside_REPL (Failed)
41/42 - regression/for-loop_with_computation_after_the_brexit_REPL (Failed)
42/43 - regression/for-loop_with_a_variable_iteration_count_REPL (Failed)
43/44 - regression/early_return_before_a_barrier_region_REPL (Failed)
44/45 - regression/id-dependent_computation_before_kernel_exit_REPL (Failed)
45/46 - regression/barrier_just_before_return_REPL (Failed)
47/48 - regression/undominated_variable_from_conditional_barrier_handling_REPL 
(Failed)
48/49 - 
regression/assigning_a_loop_iterator_variable_to_a_private_makes_it_local_REPL 
(Failed)
49/50 - 
regression/assigning_a_loop_iterator_variable_to_a_private_makes_it_local_2_REPL
 (Failed)
50/51 - regression/test_program_from_binary_with_local_1_1_1_REPL (Failed)
51/52 - regression/phi_nodes_not_replicated_LOOPS (Failed)
52/53 - regression/issues_with_local_pointers_LOOPS (Failed)
53/54 - regression/barrier_between_two_for_loops_LOOPS (Failed)
54/55 - regression/simple_for-loop_with_a_barrier_inside_LOOPS (Failed)
55/56 - regression/for-loop_with_computation_after_the_brexit_LOOPS (Failed)
56/57 - regression/for-loop_with_a_variable_iteration_count_LOOPS (Failed)
57/58 - regression/early_return_before_a_barrier_region_LOOPS (Failed)
58/59 - regression/id-dependent_computation_before_kernel_exit_LOOPS (Failed)
59/60 - regression/barrier_just_before_return_LOOPS (Failed)
61/62 - regression/undominated_variable_from_conditional_barrier_handling_LOOPS 
(Failed)
62/63 - 
regression/assigning_a_loop_iterator_variable_to_a_private_makes_it_local_LOOPS 
(Failed)
63/64 - 
regression/assigning_a_loop_iterator_variable_to_a_private_makes_it_local_2_LOOPS
 (Failed)
64/65 - regression/test_program_from_binary_with_local_1_1_1_LOOPS (Failed)
65/66 - regression/setting_a_buffer_argument_to_NULL_causes_a_segfault (Failed)
66/67 - regression/clSetKernelArg_overwriting_the_previous_kernel's_args 
(Failed)
68/69 - 
regression/case_with_multiple_variable_length_loops_and_a_barrier_in_one 
(Failed)
69/70 - regression/autolocals_in_constexprs (Failed)
71/72 - regression/vector_kernel_arguments (Failed)
75/76 - runtime/clCreateProgramWithBinary (Failed)
76/77 - runtime/clBuildProgram (Failed)
77/78 - runtime/test_kernel_cache_includes (Failed)
78/79 - runtime/clFinish (Failed)
85/86 - runtime/clSetEventCallback (Failed)
87/88 - runtime/clCreateKernelsInProgram (Failed)
88/89 - runtime/clCreateSubDevices (Failed)
90/91 - runtime/test_enqueue_kernel_from_binary (Failed)
93/94 - workgroup/unconditional_barriers_REPL (Failed)
94/95 - workgroup/unbarriered_for_loops_REPL (Failed)
95/96 - workgroup/barriered_for_loops_REPL (Failed)
96/97 - workgroup/conditional_barrier_REPL (Failed)
97/98 - workgroup/b_loop_with_none_of_the_WIs_reaching_the_barrier_REPL (Failed)
98/99 - workgroup/forcing_horizontal_parallelization_to_some_outer_loops_REPL 
(Failed)
99/100 - workgroup/loop_with_two_paths_to_the_latch_REPL (Failed)
100/101 - workgroup/b_loop_with_two_latches_REPL (Failed)
101/102 - workgroup/workgroup_sizes_work_items_get_wrong_ids_REPL (Failed)
102/103 - workgroup/different_implicit_barrier_injection_scenarios_LOOPS 
(Failed)
103/104 - workgroup/unconditional_barriers_LOOPS (Failed)
104/105 - workgroup/unbarriered_for_loops_LOOPS (Failed)
105/106 - workgroup/barriered_for_loops_LOOPS (Failed)
106/107 - workgroup/conditional_barrier_LOOPS (Failed)
107/108 - workgroup/b_loop_with_none_of_the_WIs_reaching_the_barrier_LOOPS 
(Failed)
108/109 - 
workgroup/forcing_horizontal_parallelization_to_some_outer_loops_LOOPS (Failed)
109/110 - workgroup/loop_with_two_paths_to_the_latch_LOOPS (Failed)
110/111 - workgroup/b_loop_with_two_latches_LOOPS (Failed)
111/112 - workgroup/workgroup_sizes_work_items_get_wrong_ids_LOOPS (Failed)
112/113 - workgroup/issue_548_convergent_propagation_LOOPS (Failed)
117/118 - examples/scalarwave (Child aborted)

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pocl
Source-Version: 1.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pocl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 892...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> (supplier of updated pocl package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 14:42:39 +0200
Source: pocl
Binary: pocl-opencl-icd libpocl2-common libpocl2 libpocl-dev pocl-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OpenCL Maintainers <pkg-opencl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org>
Description:
 libpocl-dev - development files for the pocl library
 libpocl2   - Portable Computing Language library
 libpocl2-common - common files for the pocl library
 pocl-doc   - documentation for the pocl library
 pocl-opencl-icd - pocl ICD
Closes: 888063 892426
Changes:
 pocl (1.1-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Upload to unstable.
 .
 pocl (1.1-4) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Run clinfo during testing.
   * Do not link with --rtlib=compiler-rt on non-x86.  (Closes: #892426)
   * Prevent PIC/no-PIC option clash on mips64el.
   * Set target cpu for armel to arm946e-s (arch=armv5te).
   * Set target cpu for armhf to arm1156t2f-s (arch=armv6t2) with
     -mfpu=vfp3-d16. Probably suboptimal (should rather be arch=armv7-a without
     neon,vfp4), but passes all tests.  (Closes: #888063)
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.4, no changes needed.
 .
 pocl (1.1-3) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Add support for building for the GENERIC cpu, i.e. llvm defaults.
   * Build with -DLLC_HOST_CPU=GENERIC on most architectures.
   * Build with -DKERNELLIB_HOST_CPU_VARIANTS=distro on amd64.
   * Switch to llvm 6.0.
 .
 pocl (1.1-2) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Switch to llvm 5.0.
   * Update symbols files for amd64 and i386.
   * Cherry-pick upstream commits for libhwloc 2.0 support.
   * Cherry-pick upstream commit fixing test_clCreateSubDevices with 3 CUs.
   * Cherry-pick upstream commit fixing reported values of native/preferred
     vector width for unsupported types.
   * pocl-doc: Mark as Multi-Arch: foreign.
   * Upload to experimental.
Checksums-Sha1:
 d56043974fe1c770f741b1afbc07707d4371fcb3 2383 pocl_1.1-5.dsc
 4b5c6f33bbefb524abced9a8a7ffcb6bbde9da36 21684 pocl_1.1-5.debian.tar.xz
 7d0de63772858dd3b3e0a2a5851e7e976ce3d02b 7556 pocl_1.1-5_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 7c94adb9c9b5fe0f10785f168fc5ee228842c93ba2daf40ed0ea512e4b9d7f0a 2383 
pocl_1.1-5.dsc
 141bb8873fe52f4873e3a6b95f3a9ec32c40663efb602f697a9a79232d1fc0cd 21684 
pocl_1.1-5.debian.tar.xz
 f640a9f1b6ff7cf42ea3cb5de9a8914a569fcf05ebcb2a3743e44ea978b8b722 7556 
pocl_1.1-5_source.buildinfo
Files:
 3cd9a31c627dc53840f1f42e3365d963 2383 libs optional pocl_1.1-5.dsc
 e0a306fd496e91de7bc3dceeb4766d77 21684 libs optional pocl_1.1-5.debian.tar.xz
 322717233320c1f93755afda0ede038b 7556 libs optional pocl_1.1-5_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=0YIG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to