Your message dated Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:04:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359157: ftp.debian.org: Please remove drbd0.8* because
it's incorrectly named
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove drbd0.8-utils and drbd0.8-module-source from unstable.
Reason: they should be called drbd8 instead of drbd0.8
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 10605 March 1977, Cyril Bouthors wrote:
> Please remove drbd0.8-utils and drbd0.8-module-source from unstable.
> Reason: they should be called drbd8 instead of drbd0.8
Nope. That are only binary packages. Rename them in your package,
upload, go through NEW, and then the not-built binaries get removed
semi-automagically.
--
bye Joerg
Yeah, patching debian/rules sounds like changing shoes while running the
100 meters track.
-- Michael Koch
pgpdf614UPqER.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
