Your message dated Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:19:25 +0000
with message-id <e1fts9t-000em5...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#900720: fixed in fsm-el 0.2.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #900720,
regarding elpa-fsm: does not byte-compile with unversioned emacs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
900720: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900720
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: elpa-ace-window
Version: 0.9.0-2
Severity: important
User: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: unversioned-emacs

Dear Maintainer/Uploader;

As described in [1], we are currently transitioning to an unversioned
"emacs" package; i.e. the actual useful-to-users package will be
"emacs" instead of "emacs25" or "emacs26".

An unversioned emacs package has been uploaded to
experimental. Unfortunately your package does not byte-compile with
this new emacs. In addition to the obvious performance impact, this
has the side-effect of your package not being recognized by the emacs
package system, and potentially causing other elpa-* packages to fail
to install.

The failure to byte-compile is most likely either caused by your
package using an outdated version of the dh-elpa helper, or by some
dependency of your package failing to bytecompile (as mentioned
above). In the former case you can fix this by doing a sourceful
upload with a current dh-elpa [2].

This bug will become RC when unversioned emacs is uploaded to
unstable. There is no fixed schedule for this, but please try to
address this bug so we can move on to other emacs related maintenance
tasks (e.g. new versions of emacs).

[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-emacsen/2018/05/msg00043.html
[2]: we can't do bin-NMUs because these are arch:all packages, and Debian does
     not currently support arch:all bin-NMUs

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.16.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_CA:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages elpa-ace-window depends on:
pn  elpa-avy        <none>
ii  emacs           47.0
ii  emacsen-common  2.0.8

Versions of packages elpa-ace-window recommends:
ii  emacs  47.0

elpa-ace-window suggests no packages.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: fsm-el
Source-Version: 0.2.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
fsm-el, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 900...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matteo F. Vescovi <m...@debian.org> (supplier of updated fsm-el package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 14:56:14 +0200
Source: fsm-el
Binary: elpa-fsm
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Emacsen team <debian-emac...@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matteo F. Vescovi <m...@debian.org>
Description:
 elpa-fsm   - state machine library
Closes: 900720
Changes:
 fsm-el (0.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Rebuild with dh-elpa 1.13 to fix byte-compilation
     with unversioned Emacs (Closes: #900720)
   * debian/control: S-V bump 3.9.8 -> 4.1.4 (no changes needed)
   * debian/control: Vcs-* fields updated pointing to salsa
   * debian/control: Maintainer field updated
   * debian/rules: drop --parallel parameter
   * debian/: debhelper bump 10 -> 11
Checksums-Sha1:
 8af782925ac48cb86a8041f3a1d1b207c26b13bb 2069 fsm-el_0.2.1-2.dsc
 36c78dcca18382da57e840cbde6696c433ed197a 2436 fsm-el_0.2.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 f184a855508b3f3f0157fea8abbe3ebdb7d4a3d6 12813 fsm-el_0.2.1-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 0df5a1a0dd5017d942568b48b9ce95673b370ad35f363d44ac926e0bd2a34fd6 2069 
fsm-el_0.2.1-2.dsc
 2062ad974d8aa224726b33e04e403dd587102d516f804aaa9a4d905075d8a09b 2436 
fsm-el_0.2.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 e958d8df97e78bcbe94f5005e33684908a8999691b8bb97cfe1d30ee0156b99d 12813 
fsm-el_0.2.1-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 9c737d8f01c4909324e8d4d61ffb2719 2069 lisp optional fsm-el_0.2.1-2.dsc
 254d5ff03ed84645e6c7d091aa545d78 2436 lisp optional 
fsm-el_0.2.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 c0a53137c01376191e5a2325aa8d0b4d 12813 lisp optional 
fsm-el_0.2.1-2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Debian powered!

iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE890J+NqH0d9QRsmbBhL0lE7NzVoFAlsiZ+ZfFIAAAAAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEYz
REQwOUY4REE4N0QxREY1MDQ2Qzk5QjA2MTJGNDk0NEVDRENENUEACgkQBhL0lE7N
zVp0Yw/6A8YeAlUFHN+pLjEPQNvtvzoKpAwAz4/+dOrU97CTk+G4AnjTiyEen1/k
Zjf0aGYXC6nkjBsjb3w7wxlMRZ638fKEbILJGLHXlNgTZ4dAl+0B+ZEEWkF5e9UK
5bXv2F2sEGuKI2LaRaXHfz4t6ASoJB1GOrZm9VY+k8sS3vX/fJOMfbEVtyFeZv6L
Ah86XaVcA8Zu++YUuVcbNcbm8pJQDe1tyGogwBdY7yjRnS0+42GKv0B+PcGRDPva
1jlOrvVSlq7bQA+O6mEPz9VPHR+KB+rnRUcpuvHVeTWipBJdzelzrr1BqYdaVKIS
V8BQt+OMGNAlSJ4JKyJjnMeyGZqZkCX77nRDZxZhbV+pzV5cE7EMmHh/z7xw65C/
yCfWhusiOhwmdwNn1juiov5pzw7Y4RstVf+fjXZDK0Y/HMZoA0Iay+qw+EIwpfyh
7D1j4ycmCkIIyu4gZ20SjCHmUGYIJR0+FKRTs31RHqftDRaypoOYjhAdNg9YS0FU
UwrI/ZCHaq8q0xldbr3lEp0i5ze23b2XfTWyWfmNkPxiJV7C/M5+vSiAnIcYPXSB
hhwGD1OHT35clBgiVe4kiCFhNqrFnLMhIwCZmplE+4mfRyEgm5D7aW9gQ0e259LR
O0HvWjvsnhKyTLvnKqRLpOMBe7tzM59J8jZK02RZkeSEKFfhnMQ=
=O+ri
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to