Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2018 20:49:40 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#874275: fixed in exifprobe 2.0.1+git20170416.3c2b769-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #874275,
regarding exifprobe: Consistent segmentation fault
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
874275: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874275
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: exifprobe
Version: 2.0.1+git20170416.3c2b769-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

When running "exifprobe -L" I get consistent "segmentation fault". Same occurs 
without the -L option.

I grabbed the debian source, and combined with a core dump I have this 
backtrace:

Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0  strlen () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/strlen.S:106
106     ../sysdeps/x86_64/strlen.S: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0  strlen () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/strlen.S:106
#1  0x00007ff6ebef9da8 in _IO_vfprintf_internal (s=s@entry=0x7ffd7d7bcdd0, 
format=<optimized out>, format@entry=0x55fc212e4c6d "%s%s%s", 
ap=ap@entry=0x7ffd7d7bcf48) at vfprintf.c:1637
#2  0x00007ff6ebfa7aa6 in ___vsnprintf_chk (s=0x7ffd7d7bd030 "", 
maxlen=<optimized out>, flags=1, slen=<optimized out>, format=0x55fc212e4c6d 
"%s%s%s", args=args@entry=0x7ffd7d7bcf48) at vsnprintf_chk.c:63
#3  0x00007ff6ebfa7a08 in ___snprintf_chk (s=s@entry=0x7ffd7d7bd030 "", 
maxlen=maxlen@entry=1024, flags=flags@entry=1, slen=slen@entry=1024, 
format=format@entry=0x55fc212e4c6d "%s%s%s") at snprintf_chk.c:34
#4  0x000055fc212a3680 in snprintf (__fmt=0x55fc212e4c6d "%s%s%s", __n=1024, 
__s=0x7ffd7d7bd030 "") at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:64
#5  splice (string1=<optimized out>, string1@entry=0x22509790 <error: Cannot 
access memory at address 0x22509790>, sep=<optimized out>, 
sep@entry=0x55fc212e1329 ".", string2=<optimized out>) at misc.c:1313
#6  0x000055fc21299c89 in process_tiff_ifd (inptr=inptr@entry=0x55fc22507010, 
byteorder=<optimized out>, ifd_offset=ifd_offset@entry=8, 
fileoffset_base=fileoffset_base@entry=12, max_offset=max_offset@entry=0, 
summary_entry=summary_entry@entry=0x55fc22509660, 
    parent_name=0x22509790 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x22509790>, 
ifdtype=0, ifdnum=0, subifdnum=-1, indent=4) at process.c:183
#7  0x000055fc2129f1e8 in process_app1 (inptr=inptr@entry=0x55fc22507010, 
app1_offset=app1_offset@entry=2, tag=tag@entry=65505, 
summary_entry=summary_entry@entry=0x55fc22509660, 
parent_name=parent_name@entry=0x55fc212e4ad8 "JPEG", indent=indent@entry=2) at 
process.c:3914
#8  0x000055fc212a1620 in process_jpeg_segments (inptr=0x55fc22507010, 
marker_offset=2, tag=65505, data_length=0, summary_entry=<optimized out>, 
parent_name=0x55fc212e4ad8 "JPEG", prefix=0x55fc212e0ca2 "@", indent=0) at 
process.c:3103
#9  0x000055fc2128c9fe in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=0x7ffd7d7bd848) at 
main.c:214


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers oldstable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), 
(500, 'oldstable'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.11.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages exifprobe depends on:
ii  libc6  2.24-17

exifprobe recommends no packages.

exifprobe suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Downgrading exifprobe to version 2.0.1-11 makes exifprobe work normally again.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: exifprobe
Source-Version: 2.0.1+git20170416.3c2b769-1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
exifprobe, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> (supplier of updated exifprobe package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 21:56:31 +0300
Source: exifprobe
Binary: exifprobe
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.1+git20170416.3c2b769-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Forensics <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Description:
 exifprobe  - read metadata from digital pictures
Closes: 874275
Changes:
 exifprobe (2.0.1+git20170416.3c2b769-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Add upstream fix for segfaults due to missing function prototypes.
     (Closes: #874275)
Checksums-Sha1:
 444242935167280d0a6ff7e1e38bf546dac9dc31 2098 
exifprobe_2.0.1+git20170416.3c2b769-1.1.dsc
 1e7247971468cc44625e4ec734b5a49d410fc6d7 8104 
exifprobe_2.0.1+git20170416.3c2b769-1.1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 c1c69c4ebec7ddd2e67f6d8361c6900f79ab896a7d25618cd4aa6690eea0661b 2098 
exifprobe_2.0.1+git20170416.3c2b769-1.1.dsc
 b916457e5828c3cace9df9c7f5df0df620d825c5221f849e9629f03dc3ff0aa4 8104 
exifprobe_2.0.1+git20170416.3c2b769-1.1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 0ba0dd1c7f4f98ae8d2930da2dbca25c 2098 graphics optional 
exifprobe_2.0.1+git20170416.3c2b769-1.1.dsc
 415342b464710f0e2284275bc3a6e3c9 8104 graphics optional 
exifprobe_2.0.1+git20170416.3c2b769-1.1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=z3lh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to