Your message dated Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:46:53 -0700
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#781794: URI_OBFU_WWW
has caused the Debian Bug report #781794,
regarding spamassassin: URI_OBFU_WWW score problem
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
781794: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781794
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.3.2-5+deb7u3
Severity: important
Since yesterday new emails keep getting score URI_OBFU_WWW, so some emails are
marked as spam, where is the problem?
LOG:
Apr 3 09:29:25 marv amavis[19348]: (19348-09) Passed CLEAN {RelayedInternal},
LOCAL [10.229.129.22]:1379 [10.229.129.22] <[email protected]> ->
<[email protected]>, Queue-ID: 5246A465A4F, Message-ID:
<[email protected]>, mail_id: lKh3fd9cw7uV, Hits: -0.425, size: 1332,
queued_as: 333AB465A50, Subject: "Re: a", From:
Filip_Havl\303\203\302\255\303\204\302\215ek_<[email protected]>_(raw:_=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Filip_Havl=ED=E8ek?=_<[email protected]>),
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0_(Windows_NT_5.1;_rv:31.0)_Gecko/20100101_Thunderbird/31.5.0,
helo=[192.168.135.67], Tests:
[ALL_TRUSTED=-1,BAYES_00=-1.9,URI_OBFU_WWW=2.475], autolearn=no,
autolearnscore=3.099, 879 ms
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.8
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-openvz-042stab092.2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages spamassassin depends on:
ii adduser 3.113+nmu3
pn libarchive-tar-perl <none>
ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.69-2
ii libnet-dns-perl 0.66-2+b2
ii libnetaddr-ip-perl 4.062+dfsg-1
ii libsocket6-perl 0.23-1+b2
ii libsys-hostname-long-perl 1.4-2
ii libwww-perl 6.04-1
ii perl 5.14.2-21+deb7u2
ii perl-modules [libio-zlib-perl] 5.14.2-21+deb7u2
Versions of packages spamassassin recommends:
ii gcc 4:4.7.2-1
ii gnupg 1.4.12-7+deb7u7
ii libc6-dev 2.13-38+deb7u8
ii libio-socket-inet6-perl 2.69-2
ii libmail-spf-perl 2.8.0-1
ii make 3.81-8.2
ii perl [libsys-syslog-perl] 5.14.2-21+deb7u2
ii re2c 0.13.5-1
ii spamc 3.3.2-5+deb7u3
Versions of packages spamassassin suggests:
ii libdbi-perl 1.622-1+deb7u1
ii libio-socket-ssl-perl 1.76-2
ii libmail-dkim-perl 0.39-1
ii libnet-ident-perl 1.23-1
ii perl [libcompress-zlib-perl] 5.14.2-21+deb7u2
ii pyzor 1:0.5.0-2
ii razor 1:2.85-4+b1
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/default/spamassassin changed [not included]
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf changed [not included]
/etc/spamassassin/v310.pre changed [not included]
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:32:24AM -0330, Allan Goulding wrote:
> For the record, we have a similar situation with this test. Messages
> were tagged with the same URI_OBFU_WWW test because the domain name was
> embedded in the message signature.
>
> In this case, the domain is www.ace-net.ca
>
> It is the -net (or -com) in the domain name that is the key to
> triggering this match. Easily reproducible with a message that contains
> a single line of text that contains the domain name.
This bug has been addressed by upstream for some time. The URI_OBFU_WWW
rule is not present at all in current rulesets, and no rule misfires on
domains such as www.ace-net.ca
Closing this bug.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
