Your message dated Fri, 28 Dec 2018 18:43:46 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: iptables: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library 
/sbin/xtables-multi
has caused the Debian Bug report #833325,
regarding iptables: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library 
/sbin/xtables-multi
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
833325: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833325
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: iptables
Version: 1.6.0-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

the "adequate" QA tool reports these for the /sbin/xtables-multi
executable:

iptables: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library /sbin/xtables-multi => 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libip4tc.so.0 
iptables: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library /sbin/xtables-multi => 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libip6tc.so.0
iptables: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library /sbin/xtables-multi => 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxtables.so.11

I guess moving xtables-multi under /usr/bin should fix them.

Thanks,
   Antonio

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages iptables depends on:
ii  libc6                    2.23-4
ii  libip4tc0                1.6.0-3
ii  libip6tc0                1.6.0-3
ii  libiptc0                 1.6.0-3
ii  libnetfilter-conntrack3  1.0.5-1
ii  libnfnetlink0            1.0.1-3
ii  libxtables11             1.6.0-3

iptables recommends no packages.

Versions of packages iptables suggests:
ii  kmod  22-1.1

-- no debconf information
-- 
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: fixed -1 1.8.1-2

On Wed, 03 Aug 2016 08:56:00 +0200 Antonio Ospite <[email protected]> wrote:
> Package: iptables
> Version: 1.6.0-3
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> the "adequate" QA tool reports these for the /sbin/xtables-multi
> executable:
> 
> iptables: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library /sbin/xtables-multi => 
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libip4tc.so.0 
> iptables: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library /sbin/xtables-multi => 
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libip6tc.so.0
> iptables: bin-or-sbin-binary-requires-usr-lib-library /sbin/xtables-multi => 
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxtables.so.11
> 

This was fixed several versions ago. Closing bug now. Thanks for
reporting :-)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to