Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2019 14:54:34 +0100
with message-id <20190203135434.gb15...@aurel32.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#921198: mipsel speed: UTM8 vs Loongson 3A (was: 
Bug#921198: hard to track down)
has caused the Debian Bug report #921198,
regarding gnutls28: does not pass one test reliably on mipsel (FTBFS)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
921198: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921198
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnutls28
Version: 3.6.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Hi

gnutls28/3.6.6-2 FTBFS on mipsel:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gnutls28&arch=mipsel&ver=3.6.6-2&stamp=1549113962&raw=0

apparently a failing test, not sure if it was already know, so
filling the bug for tracking the issue. But from previous builds it
looks the build failed as well for previous versions at least
depending of version and build host.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2019-02-03 20:44, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> 于2019年2月3日周日 下午6:51写道:
> >
> > On 2019-02-03 Willi Mann <wi...@debian.org> wrote:
> > > just for the record, I tried to reproduce the build failure on eller
> > > (mipsel porterbox), but it builds fine there. I'm wondering whether the
> > > timeout set on line 232 of tests/srp.c (40 seconds) is too short for
> > > slower build hosts.
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > The two builds on mipsel-aql-01.debian and mipsel-aql-02.debian.org
> > (both Processor: LS3A-RS780-1w (Quad Core Loongson 3A))failed, the third
> > try on mipsel-sil-01.debian.org (Processor: Rhino Labs UTM8) succeeded.
> >
> > Eller also has the same hardware (Processor: Rhino Labs UTM8) as the
> > succeeding build-machine and gnutls builds reliably there. The failing
> > test (srp) takes 22 seconds there.
> 
> Cavium's CPU works well much better than Loongson's
> 
> >
> > Is the Loongson that much slower?
> 
> In generally, it is not due to Loongson is slower, but about the
> Loongson's CPU is buggy.
> https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/21333/
> 
> We are working on add more Cavium's machines.
> And Loongson claims that their future CPU won't be so buggy.
> 
> @Aurelien, gnutls28 should be another packages that should be pinned
> on Cavium's CPU.

That's already done, Adrian Bunk hinted me about that this morning. I am
therefore closing the bug, as it has nothing to do with the package.

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to