Your message dated Thu, 07 Feb 2019 21:28:30 +0000
with message-id <e1grrdi-0006kj...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#872439: fixed in libsoc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #872439,
regarding libsoc-dev: libsoc_gpio.h is missing stdlib.h include
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
872439: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872439
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libsoc-dev
Version: 0.8.2-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

libsoc_gpio.h is missing stdlib.h include provoking following
compilation errors:

/usr/include/libsoc_gpio.h:53:17: error: 'EXIT_FAILURE' undeclared here

This bug was fixed upstream [1].

[1] 
https://github.com/jackmitch/libsoc/commit/fabf8f0083d94b5f36b456c89005359721ee8fd3

Yegor

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.1
Architecture: armhf (armv7l)

Kernel: Linux 3.18.32 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages libsoc-dev depends on:
ii  libsoc2  0.8.2-1

libsoc-dev recommends no packages.

libsoc-dev suggests no packages.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libsoc
Source-Version: 0.8.2-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libsoc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 872...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> (supplier of updated libsoc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 18:41:58 +0200
Source: libsoc
Architecture: source
Version: 0.8.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Closes: 872439
Changes:
 libsoc (0.8.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Set maintainer to Debian QA Group. (see #879389)
   * Add upstream fix for missing include in libsoc_gpio.h,
     thanks to Yegor Yefremov. (Closes: #872439)
Checksums-Sha1:
 427d7d787af0b7d9aeed979d66e8080aa4ec2dd1 1891 libsoc_0.8.2-2.dsc
 d77991a7dce157a26d5b134c48e379ecdcc180bf 2900 libsoc_0.8.2-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 465af187eedae155b74bcae893d2626ab0e51f7c942c044fc708a7b8d6ef7479 1891 
libsoc_0.8.2-2.dsc
 ef1cb384ed452311ca89dd030ab771efbce739a93a146fe365f959166a94bdf6 2900 
libsoc_0.8.2-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 890478eae6a7a8a1da68bd9b63ed08c9 1891 libs optional libsoc_0.8.2-2.dsc
 d4705c4b2d3c0a9937cd2efd0f3170b4 2900 libs optional 
libsoc_0.8.2-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Pkgg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to