Your message dated Thu, 21 Mar 2019 21:26:33 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#925206: /usr/bin/pulseview: 
Dependency missing: libpython3.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #925206,
regarding /usr/bin/pulseview: Dependency missing: libpython3.6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
925206: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925206
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pulseview
Version: 0.4.1-1+b1
Severity: important
File: /usr/bin/pulseview

Without libpython3.6, running PV only gives an error:

/usr/bin/pulseview: error while loading shared libraries: libpython3.6m.so.1.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:27:07PM +0100, Philipp Marek wrote:
> thanks for the quick answer!
> 
> > I can't see how you're getting that error. pulseview does not directly
> > require libpython, this comes from libsigrokdecode4, which correctly has
> > a dependency on libpython3.7 and is linked against that. What version of
> > libsigrokdecode are you running - is it from testing as well? I
> > correctly see a libpython3.7m.so.1.0 linkage and a libpython3.7 package
> > dependency with 0.5.2-1+b1 on amd64/testing.
> 
> Hmmm, you're right ... I've had some libraries (from local compilations)
> in /usr/local/lib/, and these still wanted libpython3.6.
> 
> Thanks - and sorry about the noise ;/

No problem. I like the easily resolved ones. ;)

J.

-- 
Revd Jonathan McDowell, ULC | "Reality Or Nothing!" -- Cold Lazarus

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to