Your message dated Sat, 23 Mar 2019 16:08:07 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line closing remaining openjdk-6 bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #614305,
regarding openjdk-6: Binaries provided by openjdk-6 appears to have SONAMEs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
614305: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614305
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openjdk-6
Severity: minor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hey,
Running [1] shows that all the public ELF executables appears to have a
SONAME. Most of these SONAMEs are just "lib.so" (except unpack200 which
have libunpack.so as SONAME).
Is there any reason for these SONAMEs?
~Niels
[1]
for FILE in /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/* ; do \
echo $FILE ; objdump -T --headers --private-headers $FILE | grep SONAME ;\
done
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=dQJQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6b41-1.13.13-1+rm
Hi,
openjdk-6 was last released with Debian 7.0 (wheezy), which had its LTS
support end nearly a year ago and which has now been archived.
I'm therefore closing the remaining openjdk-6 bugs, assuming they are no
longer relevant for newer (and still supported) openjdk releases.
Andreas
--- End Message ---
