Your message dated Sun, 07 Apr 2019 12:18:46 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#925982: fixed in exim4 4.92-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #925982,
regarding local_scan not invoked anymore
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
925982: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925982
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: exim4-daemon-heavy
Version: 4.92-1

----- Forwarded message from Graeme Fowler via Exim-users -----
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:08:04 +0000
From: Graeme Fowler via Exim-users
Subject: Re: local_scan_path change ?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: gmane.mail.exim.user

Morning all

On 29 Mar 2019, at 09:54, Niels Dettenbach via Exim-users <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> It seems local_scan.c ist not longer called / used in sa-exim setups since
> =exim 4.92 builds - tried that yesterday (own EXIM build on NetBSD). Until 
> now i didn't find any time to investigate the changes in exim sources yet - 
> so 
> any tip / hint is welcome here too...ß)

Right at the top of the Changelog:

Exim version 4.92
-----------------

JH/01 Remove code calling the customisable local_scan function, unless a new
      definition "HAVE_LOCAL_SCAN=yes" is present in the Local/Makefile.

Additional information is in the default Makefile.

Graeme
----- End forwarded message -----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: exim4
Source-Version: 4.92-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
exim4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Metzler <[email protected]> (supplier of updated exim4 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 13:39:31 +0200
Source: exim4
Architecture: source
Version: 4.92-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Exim4 Maintainers <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Andreas Metzler <[email protected]>
Closes: 774553 925982
Changes:
 exim4 (4.92-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Improved spam-scanning example with accompaning information in
     README.Debian. Explicitly warn about adding the default SpamAssassin
     report in a header, which Closes: #774553
   * Drop 90_localscan_dlopen.dpatch. (It has been non-functional for a couple
     of months.) Closes: #925982 Add a Conflicts for sa-exim, which relied on
     the (working) version of the patch. Drop exim4-dev package. Add a NEWS
     entry for this change.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 404f899c3cbe74cf35f7b3de9234337c56dffd74 2774 exim4_4.92-5.dsc
 978836acb8858ea2cc94bad5441eb86bd1837a3d 461356 exim4_4.92-5.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256: 
 6a266d6d6cb18baff35990044aa6bccdda284c566da8d4517e61f0cdd6e02d3b 2774 
exim4_4.92-5.dsc
 94cd35b45ff3fbc82ef7aeb40393667e3796bd2f8cb9871d16f560beca7ed8e6 461356 
exim4_4.92-5.debian.tar.xz
Files: 
 56863418ec2b9760d560c05ae80e4acb 2774 mail standard exim4_4.92-5.dsc
 67a11b76b93a787db0f64023644b536b 461356 mail standard 
exim4_4.92-5.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Paqc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to