Your message dated Tue, 2 Jul 2019 10:34:02 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#421759: include feynmf
has caused the Debian Bug report #421759,
regarding include feynmf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
421759: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=421759
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: <strong>fixed</strong>: latexmk 307a-2
Severity: wishlist
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
First, the praise: I find the latexmk package extremely useful for
nearly all of my needs.
Now, the request: when preparing documents including feynman diagrams
(prepared with the feynmf package), latexmk doesn't quite do everything
for me ... I still need to run feynmf in addition. It would be great if
latexmk could do this for me automatically.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Debian Release: lenny/sid
500 unstable www.debian-multimedia.org
500 unstable ftp.uk.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=======================-+-===========
|
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:4.41-1
On 02.07.19 09:58, Tim Gershon wrote:
> Thanks for following up on this issue (I must admit I had forgotten
> about it).
>
> The handling of feynman diagrams in latexmk (I have version 4.41) is
> certainly much improved. Testing a file containing feynman diagrams, I
> do still get an error on first compilation ("pdflatex: Command for
> 'pdflatex' gave return code 256"), but simply running latexmk again I
> get no errors and correct output. If I run latexmk -f at the outset I
> also get the desired outcome.
>
> So I think this can be closed.
>
Closing then.
Hilmar
--
#206401 http://counter.li.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
