Your message dated Tue, 06 Aug 2019 15:09:51 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#743555: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#743555: initscripts: 
command "halt" unintended changed behaviour
has caused the Debian Bug report #743555,
regarding initscripts: command "halt" unintended changed behaviour
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
743555: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=743555
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.88dsf-51
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,

I wondered, why the behaviour of the command halt might have changed.
When I entered the command halt as root, my systems went down and then switched 
power off.
Now it changed that way, that it is going down, but does not switch power off. 
There is a prompt "System halted".

According to the manual halt -p does poweroff. This is working here, too.
So far, so well halt is working as the manual says. 

But when I correct understand, then /etc/default/halt says, the command halt 
shall do a poweroff. And when I understand the manual correctly, the single 
command halt is calling the command "shutdown -h". If I am correct, then the 
command halt is buggy.

If I am not correct, please enlighten me, and explain me, why the single 
command halt does no more poweroff, as it did before.

Does this maybe be related to the change from sysinit to systemd?

Please apologize, if this package is the wrong one, I reported the bug to.

Thanks for your help! 

Best regards

Hans

 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to de_DE.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages initscripts depends on:
ii  coreutils       8.21-1.1
ii  debianutils     4.4
ii  libc6           2.18-4
ii  lsb-base        4.1+Debian12
ii  mount           2.20.1-5.6
ii  sysv-rc         2.88dsf-51
ii  sysvinit-utils  2.88dsf-51

Versions of packages initscripts recommends:
ii  e2fsprogs  1.42.9-3
ii  psmisc     22.21-2

initscripts suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/default/rcS changed:
TMPTIME=0
SULOGIN=no
DELAYLOGIN=no
VERBOSE=yes


-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
[2014-04-04 10:15] "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[email protected]>
> Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2014, 13:20:20 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > Hi Hans,
>
> Hi Steve, 
>
> thank you very much for your explanations. As you wrote, I already thought of 
> it, that the now correct behaviour is a bugfix of the wrong behaviour before. 
> But I had no proove of it. Thanks to you, I have now. :)
>
> So I will just shutdown with shutdown -h now or halt -p instead of halt as 
> before.
> Just as required.
>
> Now as I know the background, you can safely close the bugreport.

Closing.
-- 
Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once in a few days.
Please, mention in body of your reply when you add or remove recepients.

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to