Your message dated Fri, 20 Sep 2019 03:39:52 +0900
with message-id
<CAEe2ifVWciwyUP=qd51ajb743q-hgamphjyhy8msnj-3vo4...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#940594: Tests fail when applying new upstream commit
has caused the Debian Bug report #940594,
regarding Tests fail when applying new upstream commit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
940594: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940594
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:ibus
Hello!
We are about to upgrade ibus for Ubuntu 19.10 based on ibus
1.5.21-1~exp2. We added the upstream commit
<https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/3d442dbf> since it's a security
thing and has also been added to our stable releases.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/1.5.21-1~exp2ubuntu1
So far, so good. But then I'd like to also add the upstream commit "bus:
Use XDG_RUNTIME_DIR for Unix socket directory":
https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/a141a141
However, doing so makes a bunch of tests fail when building.
I noticed that two of the Debian patches probably conflict with that new
way to deal with the abstract socket file:
* 0003-dconf-Use-dbus-run-session-to-set-up-dconf-overrides.patch
* dconf-Create-a-temporary-XDG_RUNTIME_DIR.patch
so I tried to disable those, but it didn't help.
You can see what it looks like in this PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ibus-test/+packages
This is an example buildlog:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/443014842/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-amd64.ibus_1.5.21-1~exp2ubuntu1+test_BUILDING.txt.gz
I have reported the issue upstream as well:
https://github.com/ibus/ibus/issues/2135
But since Takao Fujiwara didn't instantly confirm the problem, I thought
I'd better call your attention to it.
--
Cheers,
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I'd rather set $XDG_CACHE_HOME than touching home dir. See if this
works:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ibus/blob/0c0df35bcb388c79b17f24a35f7f00b23be1e2ea/debian/rules#L64
Anyway closing it. I don't think the commit is in urgent need and
future upstream issues can be resolved in the future.
--- End Message ---
