Your message dated Thu, 05 Dec 2019 06:29:20 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Bug#940232: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #944326, regarding tulip: Can't install on sid, spourious binutils version dependence to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 944326: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944326 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: tulip Version: 4.8.0dfsg-2+b7 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, # apt install tulip The following packages have unmet dependencies: tulip : Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.33.1-2 is to be installed Depends: libglew2.0 (>= 1.12.0) but it is not installable Depends: libtulip-gui-4.8 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libtulip-ogl-4.8 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libtulip-python-4.8 but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. # binutils is 2.33.1-2 in testing. and 2.31.1-16 in stable/buster. This makes tulip not installable. I have a strong suspiecious that the dependence on binutils is actually not needed at all. Also I see this removal from testing over 2 years ago: https://tracker.debian.org/news/863415/tulip-removed-from-testing/ Which also mentions binutils. Also upstream version is now 5.3.1, and 5.2.1 supports even Python 3. So it would be greate to have it all fixed in Debian. Best regards, Witold -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/32 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 4.8.0dfsg-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package tulip has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/940232 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [email protected]. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
