Your message dated Fri, 6 Dec 2019 19:15:43 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#800130: libjte1: Priority "extra" mismatches libisofs6
Priority "optional"
has caused the Debian Bug report #800130,
regarding libjte1: Priority "extra" mismatches libisofs6 Priority "optional"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
800130: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800130
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libjte1
Version: 1.20-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
package libisofs6 gets a QA complaint because it has Priority "optional"
but depends at runtime on libjte1 with Priority "extra":
https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=libisofs
Besides libjte* packages, libisofs is the only user of libjte1.
The others listed by "apt-cache rdepends libjte1" are users of libisofs.
Actually libjte would have become a part of libisofs if it had not
inherited that list of copyright owners from its hash functions.
libisofs6 depends on libjte1 in order to enable Jigdo production for
installation ISOs of Debian and Ubuntu. This is quite an exotic
feature which could easily be dropped by libisofs6.
But then, debian-cd and others would have to use GNU xorriso from
source tarball rather than the Debian package xorriso, and libjte
would lose its only customer.
So please promote libjte1 Priority from "extra" to "optional".
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages libjte1 depends on:
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.6-7+b3
ii libc6 2.19-18
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1
libjte1 recommends no packages.
libjte1 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 09:55:46AM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
>Package: libjte1
>Version: 1.20-1
>Severity: normal
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>package libisofs6 gets a QA complaint because it has Priority "optional"
>but depends at runtime on libjte1 with Priority "extra":
> https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=libisofs
>
>Besides libjte* packages, libisofs is the only user of libjte1.
>The others listed by "apt-cache rdepends libjte1" are users of libisofs.
>Actually libjte would have become a part of libisofs if it had not
>inherited that list of copyright owners from its hash functions.
>
>libisofs6 depends on libjte1 in order to enable Jigdo production for
>installation ISOs of Debian and Ubuntu. This is quite an exotic
>feature which could easily be dropped by libisofs6.
>But then, debian-cd and others would have to use GNU xorriso from
>source tarball rather than the Debian package xorriso, and libjte
>would lose its only customer.
>
>So please promote libjte1 Priority from "extra" to "optional".
I think this fixed itself a long time ago. I certainly did nothing to
change it, but the problem is gone AFAICS already in Buster:
$ apt-cache show libjte1 | grep -e Version -e Priority
Version: 1.21-1
Priority: optional
So, closing...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected]
"Since phone messaging became popular, the young generation has lost the
ability to read or write anything that is longer than one hundred and sixty
characters." -- Ignatios Souvatzis
--- End Message ---
