Your message dated Wed, 4 Mar 2020 00:18:39 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#933484:
has caused the Debian Bug report #933484,
regarding Backport request (was: Re: Backport of CUDA 10 for buster?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
933484: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933484
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nvidia-cuda-toolkit
Version: 10.1.105-2
Clarification: The original request was sent to [email protected]
Hi Matthias,
I think CUDA 10 will eventually land onto buster-backports
but that still takes some time to happen :-)
On 2019-07-30 13:47, Matthias Blaicher wrote:
> Dear Debian Team,
>
> I'm currently looking into getting CUDA to work on a Turing graphics
> card with buster. Unfortunately, buster only includes CUDA 9.2, while
> CUDA 10 is required which is already in bullseye. Since
> stretch-backports includes a backport of CUDA in non-free, I wonder if
> it is feasible to also include CUDA 10 in buster-backports? Or should
> I rely on pinning?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 10.1.168-7
On 21/01/2020 13.27, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> Hello, I just want to know what is the status of this backport ?
Finally done.
Andreas
--- End Message ---
