Your message dated Sun, 8 Mar 2020 13:45:48 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#953292: RFS: c-icap/1:0.5.6-1 [QA] -- ICAP server
implementation
has caused the Debian Bug report #953292,
regarding RFS: c-icap/1:0.5.6-1 [QA] -- ICAP server implementation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
953292: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953292
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "c-icap"
* Package name : c-icap
Version : 1:0.5.6-1
Upstream Author : Christos Tsantilas <chtsanti at users.sourceforge.net>
* URL : http://c-icap.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL-2.1+
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/c-icap
Section : net
It builds those binary packages:
c-icap - ICAP server implementation
libicapapi5 - ICAP API library
libicapapi-dev - ICAP API library development files
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/c-icap
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/c-icap/c-icap_0.5.6-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* QA upload.
* New upstream version 0.5.6
* Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0
* Change to debhelper-compat
* Bump debhelper to 12
* Move Pre-depends field from libicapapi5 to c-icap in d/control
* Fix tab character in d/copyright
* Change path from /var/run/ to /run/ in postinst and postrm scripts
* Update d/libicapapi5.symbols
* autopkgtest, add sleep after restart of service
Regards,
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 09:30:37AM +0100, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote:
> On 08.03.2020 01:00, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 10:26:05AM +0100, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote:
> > > Changes since the last upload:
> > >
> > > * QA upload.
> > > * New upstream version 0.5.6
> > > * Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0
> > > * Change to debhelper-compat
> > > * Bump debhelper to 12
> > > * Move Pre-depends field from libicapapi5 to c-icap in d/control
> > > * Fix tab character in d/copyright
> > > * Change path from /var/run/ to /run/ in postinst and postrm scripts
> > > * Update d/libicapapi5.symbols
> > > * autopkgtest, add sleep after restart of service
> >
> > Hi!
> > I don't understand the /var/run/ -> /run/ change -- it looks grossly
> > incomplete. You change it only for the newly created user, but:
>
> The change was done because lintian gave me a warning about it, though it
> probably was a bad call to go trough with it since, as you pointed out, the
> rest of the code refers to /var/run
The lintian warning is real, and the change would be good -- if it were
complete. That is, user's HOME dir being transitioned, all references
inside the program changed, etc. But that's a lot of work.
> > * systems which ever had a previous version of c-icap will have the
> > user's home in /var/run/c-icap
> > * postrm will remove only the new location (on most systems /var/run/ is a
> > symlink to /run/, though)
>
> I didn't think of this, but shouldn't piuparts notice if files remained in
> the system?
Not if /var/run/ is a symlink to /run/, which is Debian's default.
> I have made a new upload without the change from /var/run/ to /run/
Uploaded, thanks!
Meow.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ in the beginning was the boot and root floppies and they were good.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ -- <willmore> on #linux-sunxi
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
--- End Message ---
