Your message dated Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:42:05 +0100 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#953055: apt-listchanges: DeprecationWarning: PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN [...] after python3.7->python3.8 has caused the Debian Bug report #953055, regarding apt-listchanges: DeprecationWarning: PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN [...] after python3.7->python3.8 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 953055: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953055 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: apt-listchanges Version: 3.22 Severity: low Dear Maintainer, As unattended-upgrades updated python (between 06:27:18 and 06:28:21), the output behaviour of apt-listchanges changed in the subsequent run (starting 06:28:21): Log started: 2020-03-03 06:27:18 apt-listchanges: Reading changelogs... apt-listchanges: Reading changelogs... [ ... snip ... ] Preparing to unpack .../python3_3.8.2-1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking python3 (3.8.2-1) over (3.7.5-3) ... [ ... snip ... ] Log ended: 2020-03-03 06:28:21 Log started: 2020-03-03 06:28:21 /usr/bin/apt-listchanges:209: DeprecationWarning: PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN will be required for '#' formats if fromversion and apt_pkg.version_compare(fromversion, version) >= 0: apt-listchanges: Reading changelogs... /usr/bin/apt-listchanges:209: DeprecationWarning: PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN will be required for '#' formats if fromversion and apt_pkg.version_compare(fromversion, version) >= 0: apt-listchanges: Reading changelogs... I reported a similar bug in debsecan just now (don't have the number of it yet) but insofar this doesn't cause an email to be triggered to me every 10 minutes, I'm filing this one as "low." —please let me know if you need any further information! -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages apt-listchanges depends on: ii apt 1.8.4 ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.73 ii python3 3.8.2-1 ii python3-apt 1.8.6 ii python3-debconf 1.5.73 ii sensible-utils 0.0.12+nmu1 ii ucf 3.0038+nmu1 apt-listchanges recommends no packages. Versions of packages apt-listchanges suggests: ii elinks [www-browser] 0.13.1-1 ii postfix [mail-transport-agent] 3.4.9-1 ii python3-gi 3.34.0-6 ii xterm [x-terminal-emulator] 353-1 -- debconf information excluded
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 1.9.1 On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 05:24:25PM +0100, Robert Luberda wrote: > reassign 953055 python3-apt 1.8.6 > affects 953055 apt-listchanges > thanks > > Anders Breindahl writes: > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > As unattended-upgrades updated python (between 06:27:18 and 06:28:21), > > the output behaviour of apt-listchanges changed in the subsequent run > > (starting 06:28:21): > > > > Log started: 2020-03-03 06:28:21 > > /usr/bin/apt-listchanges:209: DeprecationWarning: PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN will > > be required for '#' formats > > if fromversion and apt_pkg.version_compare(fromversion, version) >= 0: > > > I've just done a few tests, using a command like the following: > /usr/bin/apt-listchanges -f text --since 9:9999 any_package.deb > and I can reproduce the warning when python3-apt 1.8.6 is installed, but > the warning is gone after upgrading python3-apt to 1.9.9. > > It looks like the bug can be closed now; however I am reassigning it, > because it might be better if python3-apt maintainer confirms it, > especially that I have no idea what the PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN warning is > actually about. > yes. also it's not a bug anyway, it was a temporary workaround in 1.8.y to ignore that warning, while it was fixed in 1.9.1 back in December, as the change was not suitable to make for 1.8.y. See #944091 for more details. -- debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev ubuntu core developer i speak de, en
--- End Message ---
