Your message dated Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:27:58 +0000
with message-id <20200316162758.GA15535@blodeuwedd>
and subject line Re: Bug#954049: lintian-brush: combine into one commit the
move of name/contact from upstream metadata to debian copyright
has caused the Debian Bug report #954049,
regarding lintian-brush: combine into one commit the move of name/contact from
upstream metadata to debian copyright
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
954049: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954049
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian-brush
Version: 0.59
Severity: wishlist
When lintian-brush moves the name/contact fields from the upstream
metadata to the debian copyright file, it generates two commits; one
for the removal and one for the addition. I think that this is overkill and one
commit doing the move should be enough.
I suggest this as the commit message for the single commit:
Move some upstream metadata fields to Debian copyright info
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers testing-debug
APT policy: (900, 'testing-debug'), (900, 'testing'), (860,
'testing-proposed-updates'), (800, 'unstable-debug'), (800, 'unstable'), (790,
'buildd-unstable'), (700, 'experimental-debug'), (700, 'experimental'), (690,
'buildd-experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, TAINT_OOT_MODULE,
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_AU:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages lintian-brush depends on:
ii devscripts 2.20.2
ii python3 3.7.5-3
ii python3-breezy 3.0.1-2
ii python3-debian 0.1.36
ii python3-distro-info 0.23
ii python3-dulwich 0.19.15-1
ii python3-iniparse 0.4-3
ii python3-levenshtein 0.12.0-5
ii python3-pkginfo 1.4.2-3
ii python3-ruamel.yaml 0.15.89-3+b1
Versions of packages lintian-brush recommends:
ii dos2unix 7.4.0-2
ii gpg 2.2.19-2
ii libdebhelper-perl 12.9
ii lintian 2.55.0
pn python3-asyncpg <none>
ii python3-pyinotify 0.9.6-1.2
Versions of packages lintian-brush suggests:
ii gnome-pkg-tools 0.21.2
pn postgresql-common <none>
-- no debconf information
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tag 954049 +confirmed
thanks
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:17:25AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> When lintian-brush moves the name/contact fields from the upstream
> metadata to the debian copyright file, it generates two commits; one
> for the removal and one for the addition. I think that this is overkill and
> one commit doing the move should be enough.
>
> I suggest this as the commit message for the single commit:
>
> Move some upstream metadata fields to Debian copyright info
Yep, we can definitely do this. The reason why it's two commits at the
moment is more practical than intentional. It's a result of the code
structure in lintian-brush; the code that adds items in
debian/copyright based on debian/upstream/metadata and the code that
removes duplicate items from debian/upstream/metadata are separate
scripts.
jelmer
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
