Your message dated Sun, 22 Mar 2020 08:08:52 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#898727: Please provide adt-virt-* names, at least for
buster
has caused the Debian Bug report #898727,
regarding Please provide adt-virt-* names, at least for buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
898727: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898727
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: autopkgtest
Version: 5.3.1
These names are part of an external interface. It is not very
friendly to just remove them them.
This is particularly true because other programs have an expectation
that they can have the user specify `foo' and then run `adt-virt-foo'
from PATH.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <[email protected]> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Ian,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:57:34 +0100 Simon McVittie <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2018 at 20:09:47 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Martin Pitt writes ("Re: Bug#898727: Please provide adt-virt-* names, at
> > least for buster"):
> > > These were deprecated
> > > two years ago (with warning messages) and removed one year ago
> > > stable release seems just unnecessary effort to me.
> >
> > They were not dropped in a stable release. They are present in
> > autopkgtest 4.4 in stretch, and AFAICT they generate no deprecation
> > warnings.
> ...
> > So I think a sensible transition would keep them (with the deprecation
> > warnings) in buster.
>
> This didn't happen. Given that, I don't think bringing them back in
> bullseye would make sense, so this bug report is no longer actionable
> and should probably be closed?
Simon is right, this didn't happen and I don't think it makes sense to
keep the bug open. Hence, closing it.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
