Your message dated Mon, 20 Apr 2020 10:21:23 -0700
with message-id <87ftcyxecs.fsf@ponder>
and subject line Re: Bug#900748: u-boot-sunxi: Backport suggestion: reduce DRAM
clock speed of Orange Pi Zero
has caused the Debian Bug report #900748,
regarding u-boot-sunxi: Backport suggestion: reduce DRAM clock speed of Orange
Pi Zero
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
900748: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900748
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: u-boot-sunxi
Version: 2016.11+dfsg1-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
it seems reasonable to integrate
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commitdiff;h=8792a64d87708139bc0cf8b48d4a580a39167473
into the stable version of u-boot-sunxi. I personally wasn't able to
reproduce a clear before-after scenario, but the commit log is
suggesting that the DRAM clock speed reduction is an important measure
to increase stability.
Jan
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (501, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: armhf (armv7l)
Kernel: Linux 4.14.47 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2017.09+dfsg1-1
On 2019-02-28, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2018-06-04, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> it seems reasonable to integrate
>>
>> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commitdiff;h=8792a64d87708139bc0cf8b48d4a580a39167473
>>
>> into the stable version of u-boot-sunxi. I personally wasn't able to
>> reproduce a clear before-after scenario, but the commit log is
>> suggesting that the DRAM clock speed reduction is an important measure
>> to increase stability.
>
> With buster coming soon, it might be best to just use a newer u-boot at
> this point, unless someone really wants to tackle this soon.
And with buster released, marking this as done. I don't forsee this
getting backported to oldstable at this point.
live well,
vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
