Your message dated Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:35:53 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#958381: fixed in nmrpflash 0.9.14-16-ge95526d-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #958381,
regarding nmrpflash: please make the build reproducible
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
958381: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958381
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: nmrpflash
Version: 0.9.14-16-ge95526d-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: [email protected]
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]

Hi,

Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that
nmrpflash could not be built reproducibly.

This is because, whilst it uses SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, it does not ensure
that the date ignores the build timezone when generating the manpage.

Patch attached that specifies UTC.

 [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-
--- a/debian/rules      2020-04-21 09:28:35.664524460 +0100
--- b/debian/rules      2020-04-21 09:29:15.524749917 +0100
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 debian/nmrpflash.1: debian/nmrpflash.pod
        pod2man -c "nmrpflash documentation" \
            --release "nmrpflash $(DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM)" \
-           --date "$(shell date --date=@$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH) +%Y-%m-%d)" \
+           --date "$(shell date --utc --date=@$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH) +%Y-%m-%d)" 
\
            $< > $@
 
 override_dh_auto_install:: $(MANUALS)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: nmrpflash
Source-Version: 0.9.14-16-ge95526d-2
Done: Damyan Ivanov <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nmrpflash, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Damyan Ivanov <[email protected]> (supplier of updated nmrpflash package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:38:57 +0000
Source: nmrpflash
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.14-16-ge95526d-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Damyan Ivanov <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Damyan Ivanov <[email protected]>
Closes: 958381
Changes:
 nmrpflash (0.9.14-16-ge95526d-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * use UTC date when passing date to pod2man, making the build reproducible.
     Thanks to Chris Lamb. (Closes: #958381)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 db2bbdb8e597e171ef722fb42a2b0abc207beb55 1985 
nmrpflash_0.9.14-16-ge95526d-2.dsc
 33b2b2812a7c86e64d51ce24cd7bf68ccf78ac8e 4028 
nmrpflash_0.9.14-16-ge95526d-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256: 
 ffce4263dfce755f5066a80a25cd16798b4aa4213efaccdb941df65f780f413a 1985 
nmrpflash_0.9.14-16-ge95526d-2.dsc
 97a265a290d76f78633d90a63551934c2fdbf15f74368a880211a2d0912c174a 4028 
nmrpflash_0.9.14-16-ge95526d-2.debian.tar.xz
Files: 
 f09a6109b555f15597222ff9a3a4f958 1985 otherosfs optional 
nmrpflash_0.9.14-16-ge95526d-2.dsc
 021c066604435aa67482c66a1d552eab 4028 otherosfs optional 
nmrpflash_0.9.14-16-ge95526d-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=20mo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to