Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2020 20:21:03 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#816468: fixed in patchelf 0.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #816468,
regarding small memory leak fix
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
816468: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: patchelf
Version: 0.9

A user on Github mentioned a small memory leak fix. Maybe you want to apply that to the Debian package.
https://github.com/NixOS/patchelf/pull/67#issuecomment-190199386

https://github.com/NixOS/patchelf/pull/67#issuecomment-190199386

--- a/src/patchelf.cc
+++ b/src/patchelf.cc
@@ -1612,6 +1612,7 @@
     fileName = argv[i];
 
     patchElf();
+    if (contents) free(contents);
 
     return 0;
 }

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: patchelf
Source-Version: 0.11-1
Done: Felipe Sateler <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
patchelf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Felipe Sateler <[email protected]> (supplier of updated patchelf package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 14:41:30 -0400
Source: patchelf
Architecture: source
Version: 0.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Felipe Sateler <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Felipe Sateler <[email protected]>
Closes: 816467 816468 821435
Changes:
 patchelf (0.11-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version 0.11
     - More modern C++ has avoided a memory leak (Closes: #816468)
     - force-rpath is now consistently used (Closes: #816467)
   * Set field Upstream-Contact in debian/copyright.
   * Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Submit.
   * Remove obsolete fields Contact, Name from debian/upstream/metadata
     (already present in machine-readable debian/copyright).
   * Update standards version to 4.5.0, no changes needed.
   * Drop patches picked from upstream
   * Fix set-rpath corrupting binaries on mips.
     Pick a couple of proposed upstream patches to address the mips set-rpath 
failures.
     (Closes: #821435)
Checksums-Sha1:
 6a839eeb34cad2cf8cff6e8de3e74c26af004a75 1957 patchelf_0.11-1.dsc
 b8c1bb3533a6e7b494c4e19d8a695c2511efc7b3 101044 patchelf_0.11.orig.tar.gz
 451a2ee4aeb9029f84b7689cea10675043b60c73 5244 patchelf_0.11-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 d6f0775d6bfc7fc3f91a2e1e105aa86260509422e75bc02c0344913090833374 1957 
patchelf_0.11-1.dsc
 e9dc4dbed842e475176ef60531c2805ed37a71c34cc6dc5d1b9ad68d889aeb6b 101044 
patchelf_0.11.orig.tar.gz
 f51ad2f5f47edba64f84017830772a2b1e9f5cb9f53c269e218fa1a61cf9bbea 5244 
patchelf_0.11-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 898a3b29d76fab42c1bdfacb2ee63a6a 1957 utils optional patchelf_0.11-1.dsc
 6cffb77ee7a95bd314d954a6aeb53a02 101044 utils optional 
patchelf_0.11.orig.tar.gz
 1f0bed1ee2d7820eabf77f9f6ac62661 5244 utils optional 
patchelf_0.11-1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=i7kH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to