Your message dated Sun, 21 Jun 2020 08:24:23 +0200 with message-id <20200621062423.GG390@sarastro> and subject line Re: Bug#825959: ifdef now requires weird quoting, sometimes has caused the Debian Bug report #825959, regarding ifdef now requires weird quoting, sometimes to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 825959: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825959 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: mutt-patched Version: 1.6.0-1 Severity: minor -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I had this in my .muttrc before: ifdef sidebar-open set sidebar_format="%B%?F? [%F]?%* %?N?%N?" that started giving weird errors about an unknown variable as of the most recent upgrade; now it appears it needs to be: ifdef sidebar-open 'set sidebar_format="%B%?F? [%F]?%* %?N?%N?"' Maybe it's always supposed to have been that way, but it's weird for the behavior to change w/o being mentioned. - -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (130, 'unstable'), (120, 'experimental'), (1, 'experimental-debug') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages mutt-patched depends on: ii libassuan0 2.4.2-3 ii libc6 2.22-9 ii libcomerr2 1.43-2 ii libgnutls30 3.4.12-1 ii libgpg-error0 1.22-2 ii libgpgme11 1.6.0-3 ii libgssapi-krb5-2 1.13.2+dfsg-5 ii libidn11 1.32-3 ii libk5crypto3 1.13.2+dfsg-5 ii libkrb5-3 1.13.2+dfsg-5 ii libncursesw5 6.0+20160319-1 ii libsasl2-2 2.1.26.dfsg1-15 ii libtinfo5 6.0+20160319-1 ii libtokyocabinet9 1.4.48-10 ii mutt 1.6.0-1 mutt-patched recommends no packages. mutt-patched suggests no packages. - -- no debconf information -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAldNzB8ACgkQ+z+IwlXqWf54rwCffPKxeuCytx8BWFirT102sYLF x4sAn2wAuZRdHP9boYxSBDqso0Vl7/Bg =98uw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Control: reassign -1 mutt Control: tag -1 +wontfix On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:38:50PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Package: mutt-patched > Version: 1.6.0-1 > Severity: minor > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I had this in my .muttrc before: > > ifdef sidebar-open set sidebar_format="%B%?F? [%F]?%* %?N?%N?" > > that started giving weird errors about an unknown variable as of the > most recent upgrade; now it appears it needs to be: > > ifdef sidebar-open 'set sidebar_format="%B%?F? [%F]?%* %?N?%N?"' > > Maybe it's always supposed to have been that way, but it's weird for the > behavior to change w/o being mentioned. Marking it as non-fix, as if we change behavior again 4 years later it is going to present the same problem (of change of behavior).
--- End Message ---
