Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 04:02:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328795: fixed in plum 2.33.1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---Package: plum Version: 2.33.1-9 Severity: serious Hi, During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very long time could cover up some QA problems. I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose to remove it. It has very few users, some bugs and seems to be quite dead in general. This usually means that your package matched some of the following criteria: [1] Your packages has not had a maintainer upload for more than three years. [2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**) [3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you might be MIA [4] (if we propose a removal) it shows in popcon as having less than 100 users with the package installed. [5] the package was not released with sarge and at least ([1] and ( [2] or [3] or [4] or [5] )) was true. (**) The maintainer not answering to RC bugs refers to bugs filed more than one month before the time the check was performed. After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it). The package will need an upload or an explanation for this action not to proceed. Please do *not* upload a package just to get off this list - it won't help the package at all. Maintainers should be responsive and feel responsible for their packages without needing other people to force them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users. Thanks! Marc
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: plum Source-Version: 2.33.1-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of plum, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: plum_2.33.1-10.diff.gz to pool/main/p/plum/plum_2.33.1-10.diff.gz plum_2.33.1-10.dsc to pool/main/p/plum/plum_2.33.1-10.dsc plum_2.33.1-10_all.deb to pool/main/p/plum/plum_2.33.1-10_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated plum package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 01:48:49 +0900 Source: plum Binary: plum Architecture: source all Version: 2.33.1-10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: plum - IRC proxy, stationing, logging, and bot program (pirc) Closes: 61630 145672 204470 302980 328795 340331 359554 Changes: plum (2.33.1-10) unstable; urgency=low . * It's still maintained by the maintainer, new package is uploaded. (Closes: #328795) * debian/control: New maintainer mail address. * debian/copyright: Distinguish between Copyright Holder and License. (Closes: #302980) * Finish /usr/doc transition by rebuild. (Closes: #359554) * Fix /usr/share/doc/plum/module.html refers to local patchs. (Closes: #145672) * Move /usr/lib/plum executables to /usr/share/plum, because it's arch independent files. * debian/README.Debian: Very minimal English documentation. (Closes: #61630) * Updating Standards-Version: 3.6.2. Update debian/compat and debian/control. * debian/patch0.plum-debian: Renamed from patch.plum-debian. * debian/patch1.bind: Renamed from patch.bind. * debian/patch2.timeout: Added to change default timeout from 120 to 20. * debian/patch3.string0fix: Added to fix string "0" line bug that modifies only "0" line to the empty line during input/output with IRC clients. Note that this fix is limited only to the plum main privmsg routine, but other modules should be also fixed. Patch proposed by Fumitoshi UKAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. (Closes: #340331) * debian/patch4.jisSOfix: Added to fix jis_jis function SO bug fix. If "\cO" (SI) is specified, $kanji mode expects 2 (SO Hankaku-kana was already specified), and the ASCII mode (ESC $ B) should be issued. But the current code does not work correctly because of "$kanji != 2". Patch proposed by MATSUDA Yoh-ichi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. (Closes: #204470) Files: 30dd2c5a86b1adfed076a2dace1ca56f 554 net optional plum_2.33.1-10.dsc 5fe345858cccd972a1bac2ad9d08c608 11792 net optional plum_2.33.1-10.diff.gz 45a3a56e8db81182900814849b141181 125324 net optional plum_2.33.1-10_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEaF1TqIqasIZIJsMRAhscAJ0aWqKkq0U8T99vcoUh1LwUXzwXoQCfYCAE U++4uF/yurcMdj5cR4NegIc= =OhVa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
