Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2020 20:22:24 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#974992: Licencing disagreement causes user confusion
has caused the Debian Bug report #974992,
regarding Licencing disagreement causes user confusion
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
974992: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974992
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: vrms
Version: 1.27
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
fonts-ubuntu is shipped by default on Ubuntu systems. It has significant
reverse dependencies and cannot be uninstalled easily.
Debian considers fonts-ubuntu to be “non-free”, while Canonical
disagrees. But vrms lists fonts-ubuntu as non-free also on Ubuntu systems.
Recently I have seen two Ask Ubuntu questions where users have run vrms,
found fonts-ubuntu to be non-free, and tried to uninstall the package:
* https://askubuntu.com/q/1292336
* https://askubuntu.com/q/1292751
This situation is unfortunate. Given the difference in opinion, I would
suggest that vrms does not count fonts-ubuntu as non-free when built on
Ubuntu systems.
--
Thanks!
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I reopened this bug, since I feel it was closed prematurely.
Please consider the merge proposal.
--
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj
--- End Message ---
