Your message dated Sun, 22 Nov 2020 18:04:01 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#824502: fixed in gdk-pixbuf 2.40.0+dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #824502,
regarding gdk-pixbuf: Please split the X11 dependent plugins into a separate 
package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
824502: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824502
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gdk-pixbuf
Severity: wishlist

Hi!
Since gdk-pixbuf is increasingly used on servers and is very useful in general
without any GUI, having it pull in a big amount of X11 isn't nice.
Fedora splits out the xlib dependent stuff into a separate package, greatly
reducing the dependencies of the core gdk-pixbuf.
It would be awesome if we could do that in Debian too!
Cheers,
    Matthias

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gdk-pixbuf
Source-Version: 2.40.0+dfsg-7
Done: Simon McVittie <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gdk-pixbuf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> (supplier of updated gdk-pixbuf package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 15:45:56 +0000
Source: gdk-pixbuf
Architecture: source
Version: 2.40.0+dfsg-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers 
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Simon McVittie <[email protected]>
Closes: 824502 942124
Changes:
 gdk-pixbuf (2.40.0+dfsg-7) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   * Release to unstable
 .
 gdk-pixbuf (2.40.0+dfsg-6) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   * Branch for experimental
   * Split main library away from Xlib integration library (see #974870).
     The Xlib integration library has been removed upstream in 2.41.x,
     and moved to a separate, deprecated source repository.
     To facilitate a transition to separate source packages, split the binary
     packages built by this source package, in the same style as the split
     that was done in Pango 1.32.5-2:
     - libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0:
       + libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 -> libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0
       + libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0 -> libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-0
     - libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev:
       + gdk-pixbuf-2.0.pc, <gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf.h>
         -> libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev
       + deprecated <gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixdata.h> -> libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev
       + gdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0.pc, <gdk-pixbuf-xlib/gdk-pixbuf-xlib.h>
         -> libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-dev
     with transitional packages to help with the upgrade path.
     The -bin, -common and -doc packages remain as they were.
   * Packages that only require gdk-pixbuf-2.0.pc and
     <gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf.h> should now build-depend on
     libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-dev | libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev.
   * Packages that require gdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0.pc and
     <gdk-pixbuf-xlib/gdk-pixbuf-xlib.h> should now build-depend on
     libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-dev | libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev.
   * The above change incidentally also drops the libX11 dependency
     from the main library (Closes: #824502)
   * d/rules: Trim trailing whitespace
   * d/control.in: Use secure URI in Homepage field
   * d/upstream/metadata: Add
   * d/rules, d/p/tests-Mark-pixbuf-randomly-modified-as-flaky.patch:
     Don't run pixbuf-randomly-modified test at build time.
     This is basically a crude fuzzer. It isn't really suitable for
     build-time acceptance testing, since it frequently produces images for
     which gdk-pixbuf will try to allocate more memory than is available,
     but if it does, it isn't straightforward to capture the failing image
     from an autobuilder that only records build logs. (Closes: #942124)
   * Mark pixbuf-randomly-modified test as flaky when run as autopkgtest too
Checksums-Sha1:
 355a0bcfb69331b5781811a0e7013237ec8b6b72 3613 gdk-pixbuf_2.40.0+dfsg-7.dsc
 b51bb2f238b157ea3e04db7849b4ded5891b0714 19592 
gdk-pixbuf_2.40.0+dfsg-7.debian.tar.xz
 1f1aeff16e5ab41ccc8f2da67a7527c5a756726b 8153 
gdk-pixbuf_2.40.0+dfsg-7_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 784c68b23b54bddbfaf29826aa7ad19d2a67abf24bb6b7ec298929ea54a71468 3613 
gdk-pixbuf_2.40.0+dfsg-7.dsc
 1840631fc616abfec0f38c33926bea4f1595481046051ec5bca06f1cfb75f111 19592 
gdk-pixbuf_2.40.0+dfsg-7.debian.tar.xz
 81c589e5c5d185289fb9b1e0f86cf6f7a37237faf3950e9a920666fa5f0144cd 8153 
gdk-pixbuf_2.40.0+dfsg-7_source.buildinfo
Files:
 e5791914edf2b7a167c6318e8778ae8a 3613 libs optional 
gdk-pixbuf_2.40.0+dfsg-7.dsc
 b539a2cc09448e2295c6ce3429474fce 19592 libs optional 
gdk-pixbuf_2.40.0+dfsg-7.debian.tar.xz
 fff530d0070ca33afca08926adafad02 8153 libs optional 
gdk-pixbuf_2.40.0+dfsg-7_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEENuxaZEik9e95vv6Y4FrhR4+BTE8FAl+6pYkACgkQ4FrhR4+B
TE8yiw//b1AzhEz25t59F9jwv7MKj9v+E2gV3vexku6v9wgSbbkS86A3c7Pn+5LA
EiS3HFnyu+wMsWRKjnSUd2Y9XzOcEivEW/X7nMw+uFBD0TM/O8ejX8PnVHmmNr+A
3zv3c4fboPFFyrHyE2nUyP6M8KEKTVAV0RzNpMGBFcy1LFrf60YDrPPJoG7SAhRm
/b26yGe6HojCT3h2cbH2fFQM38Uz+Utv79Qlc623dfcE48pRR/3fGOzaRBIg8VI7
WR7Uhv1I6rQzhnLnfJN0oka8haE9QMItlcie1uriI4Ck7acXj+sRcWzSkyJrX/jN
7OhknoLpbBYWTsMgz/ZVrZnKKJxoqRhCoGePKx3s34azkS5WD4jKJ48FMdSLwYCY
IgcKTeThP9AsPYieZ3ZjU874wbvdxau/mERvGd+w5uoWhDaqJB/q9G6ygs98mlXK
apy4uDiogcp0bWw0m+bHIgjA1LkWjrp7gH8iYBf+2/Xq1Mc9nvHUQNIHu8+eghKR
QLqA5XYtIldsI71n0JfHjdjlBWDSRtmAfgrriF2Hd3y/hqvqR4lbq8h5bS+WGxG6
gPd1phZ9jTwmWY/XBBO0XA11duRuL/aLBFq1gb1TC+6LV9RFx9ITh9T7iCl+8uta
RVsN++Pff7k43jngcpuri7It3l1Usi5zJMrSUjNKA5ON8oVJkTY=
=5gLX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to