Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 09:06:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367523: manpages-dev: Please include documentation for 
fclean.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: manpages-dev
Version: 2.28-1
Severity: wishlist
X-GNU-Doc-File: libc_13.html#IDX1082

Please document the strange gnuism "fclean".  I've considered writing
a patch, but I don't know if it would be better to patch fflush.3,
fpurge.3, or to write a new page (fpurge references fclean, but the
page doesn't actually exist).  Let me know which is preferrable, and
I'll put something together.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:54:48PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> > Package: manpages-dev
> > Version: 2.28-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> > X-GNU-Doc-File: libc_13.html#IDX1082
> > 
> > Please document the strange gnuism "fclean".  I've considered writing
> > a patch, but I don't know if it would be better to patch fflush.3,
> > fpurge.3, or to write a new page (fpurge references fclean, but the
> > page doesn't actually exist).  Let me know which is preferrable, and
> > I'll put something together.
> 
> Have you written a program that tries to use this?  In which version(s)
> of glibc is it present?
Erm, no...it seems to be a piece of documentation missing an
implementation...closing (Joey, this could probably be removed from
the undocumented list).

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to