Your message dated Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:15:25 +0200 with message-id <20210218131525.GA14719@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#980122: tagging 980122 has caused the Debian Bug report #980122, regarding RM: fbpanel -- RoQA; RC-buggy, dead upstream, unmaintained to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 980122: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980122 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove fbpanel. It FTBFSes with GCC 10, depends on legacy packages (Py2, GTK2), is dead upstream (last commit five years ago) and the last maintainer upload was in 2017. Cheers, Moritz
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---I am closing this bug for now since there does not seem any reason left for not shipping fbpanel in bullseye. Feel free to submit RC bugs against fbpanel if any problem(s) appear or have not yet been mentioned. cu Adrian On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:13:57AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 01:53:17AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > * Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > tags 980122 + moreinfo > > Sorry, I wanted to write an email about this but got distracted. > > > * Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > depends on legacy packages (Py2, GTK2), > > > is dead upstream > > > > These points haven't changed, even with Adrian's NMU, right? > > fbpanel never had a runtime dependency on Python, > and build dependencies on Python 2 are permitted in bullseye. > This might change in bookworm, but that is behind the horizon. > > GTK2 dependencies are not a reason for removal, and #967335 says > "perhaps removing GTK 2 from Debian will never be feasible". > > "dead upstream" is true for large parts of the archive, > unless there is security exposure this is acceptable. > > "RC-buggy" was the only known real problem with this package, > and I fixed this with the patches from Ubuntu. > > > Chris > > cu > Adrian
--- End Message ---
