Your message dated Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:19:54 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#991570: policykit-1-gnome: still depends on
transitional package libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0
has caused the Debian Bug report #991570,
regarding policykit-1-gnome: still depends on transitional package
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
991570: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991570
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: policykit-1-gnome
Version: 0.105-7
Severity: normal
Dear maintainers,
the current version of policykit-1-gnome still depends on the transitional
package libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 instead of libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0. You might want
to trigger a binNMU build to fix dependencies.
Best regards,
Thomas Uhle
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.0
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)
Foreign Architectures: armhf
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-8-arm64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages policykit-1-gnome depends on:
ii libc6 2.31-13
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.40.2-2
ii libglib2.0-0 2.66.8-1
ii libgtk-3-0 3.24.24-4
ii libpolkit-agent-1-0 0.105-31
ii libpolkit-gobject-1-0 0.105-31
ii policykit-1 0.105-31
policykit-1-gnome recommends no packages.
policykit-1-gnome suggests no packages.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.105-7+b1
Now really closing this ticket! Sorry for the additional post.
Best regards,
Thomas Uhle
--- End Message ---
