Your message dated Fri, 12 Nov 2021 21:19:07 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#999103: fixed in electric-fence 2.2.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #999103,
regarding electric-fence: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch 
and/or build-indep
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
999103: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999103
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: electric-fence
Version: 2.2.5
Severity: important
Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
Tags: bookworm sid
User: [email protected]
Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep

Dear maintainer,

Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be
affected by this issue.

This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html .
The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month.

Best,

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: electric-fence
Source-Version: 2.2.6
Done: Matthew Vernon <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
electric-fence, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthew Vernon <[email protected]> (supplier of updated electric-fence package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 18:58:14 +0000
Source: electric-fence
Binary: electric-fence
Architecture: source
Version: 2.2.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Matthew Vernon <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Matthew Vernon <[email protected]>
Description:
 electric-fence - A malloc(3) debugger
Closes: 999103
Changes:
 electric-fence (2.2.6) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Move to entirely dh-based packaging (Closes: #999103)
   * Bump standards-version
   * Lintian-inspired packaging fixes
Checksums-Sha1:
 1386452c72b27330e7dd547fed17e0bfa272451c 1578 electric-fence_2.2.6.dsc
 84d9aaf96cc16e56f325b085e39b443e65a50734 30440 electric-fence_2.2.6.tar.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 ca838ecdcf7420964d97b29a4182f7e94fb58c2d6868095182a03691cd990bec 1578 
electric-fence_2.2.6.dsc
 a949e0dedb06cbcd444566cce1457223f2c41abd3513f21663f30f19ccc48e24 30440 
electric-fence_2.2.6.tar.gz
Files:
 4e61a75859e8844cc58522b9bed60380 1578 devel optional electric-fence_2.2.6.dsc
 b8219270f2010bf1953db3f15cec04a3 30440 devel optional 
electric-fence_2.2.6.tar.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=rIn+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to