Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:16:39 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <ad33e5f-3c70-37a7-26f1-aa79e422b...@sourcepole.ch>
and subject line Close bug report
has caused the Debian Bug report #902667,
regarding terminology: Terminology fails to start
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
902667: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902667
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: terminology
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,



mark@plata:~$ terminology
terminology: error while loading shared libraries: libelementary.so.1: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory

Package libelementary1 does not contain .so

dpkg --listfiles libelementary1
/.
/usr
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/edje
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/edje/modules
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/edje/modules/elm
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/edje/modules/elm/v-1.20
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules/access_output
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules/access_output/v-1.20
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules/clock_input_ctxpopup
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules/clock_input_ctxpopup/v-1.20
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules/prefs
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules/prefs/v-1.20
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules/test_entry
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules/test_entry/v-1.20
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules/test_map
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules/test_map/v-1.20
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules/web
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules/web/none
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elementary/modules/web/none/v-1.20
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libelementary1
/usr/share/doc/libelementary1/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/libelementary1/changelog.gz
/usr/share/doc/libelementary1/copyright
/usr/share/lintian
/usr/share/lintian/overrides
/usr/share/lintian/overrides/libelementary1






-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.16.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_GB:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages terminology depends on:
ii  libc6                 2.27-3
ii  libecore-con1         1.20.7-5
ii  libecore-evas1        1.20.7-5
ii  libecore-file1        1.20.7-5
ii  libecore-imf1         1.20.7-5
ii  libecore-input1       1.20.7-5
ii  libecore-ipc1         1.20.7-5
ii  libecore1             1.20.7-5
ii  libedje1              1.20.7-5
ii  libeet1               1.20.7-5
ii  libefreet-bin         1.20.7-5
ii  libefreet1a           1.20.7-5
ii  libeina1a             1.20.7-5
ii  libelementary1        1.20.7-5
ii  libemotion1           1.20.7-5
ii  libethumb-client-bin  1.20.7-5
ii  libethumb-client1     1.20.7-5
ii  libevas1              1.20.7-5
ii  libevas1-engines-x    1.20.7-5
ii  terminology-data      1.2.1-1

terminology recommends no packages.

Versions of packages terminology suggests:
ii  libelementary-bin   1.20.7-5
pn  libemotion-players  <none>

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
(doing a bit of triage before reporting my bug)

The bug report #902667:

* concerns a version of terminology (1.2.1-1) prior to the one in current
  Debian stable (bullseye) (1.9.0-2)
* the last post from 2018 in that bugreport marked as "moreinfo" asks the
  submitter a question that the latter never answered

Given these I think that bug won't ever be fixed?

Therefore I am closing it. I hope that's OK for all parties involved.

Please reopen or tell me if that's not OK.
*t

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to