Your message dated Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:18:57 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Bug#1000229: fixed in memlockd 1.3-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000229, regarding binary package is missing /usr/sbin/memlockd to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 1000229: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000229 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: memlockd Version: 1.3-2 Severity: grave Hello! The subject says it all: The package is missing the binary: ,---- | oweh@ds9:~$ dpkg -L memlockd | /. | /etc | /etc/default | /etc/init.d | /etc/init.d/memlockd | /etc/memlockd.d | /lib | /lib/systemd | /lib/systemd/system | /lib/systemd/system/memlockd.service | /usr | /usr/sbin | /usr/share | /usr/share/doc | /usr/share/doc/memlockd | /usr/share/doc/memlockd/changelog.Debian.gz | /usr/share/doc/memlockd/changelog.gz | /usr/share/doc/memlockd/copyright | /usr/share/man | /usr/share/man/man8 | /etc/memlockd.cfg | /etc/default/memlockd `---- Interestingly, when I rebuild the 1.3-2 source package locally, I get a DEB with the daemon in it: ,---- | oweh@ds9:/tmp/test$ ls -l from_archive/ rebuild/ | from_archive/: | total 8 | -rw-r--r-- 1 oweh oweh 5732 13. Nov 16:27 memlockd_1.3-2_amd64.deb | | rebuild/: | total 16 | -rw-r--r-- 1 oweh oweh 13432 19. Nov 22:58 memlockd_1.3-2_amd64.deb `---- ,---- | oweh@ds9:/tmp/test$ debdiff from_archive/memlockd_1.3-2_amd64.deb rebuild/memlockd_1.3-2_amd64.deb | [The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have | different names, permissions or owners.] | | Files in second .deb but not in first | ------------------------------------- | -rw-r--r-- root/root /etc/default/memlockd | -rw-r--r-- root/root /etc/memlockd.cfg | -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/man/man8/memlockd.8.gz | -rwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/sbin/memlockd | | Files in first .deb but not in second | ------------------------------------- | -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/memlockd/changelog.gz | | Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) | ------------------------------------------------ | Installed-Size: [-31-] {+56+} `---- The buildlog from the buildd also confirms the missing binary: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=memlockd&arch=amd64&ver=1.3-2&stamp=1636816430&raw=0 Weird. Grüße, Sven. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (200, 'experimental'), (1, 'experimental-debug') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.14.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages memlockd depends on: ii adduser 3.118 memlockd recommends no packages. memlockd suggests no packages. -- debconf-show failed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: memlockd Source-Version: 1.3-2.1 Done: Paul Wise <[email protected]> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of memlockd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [email protected], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Wise <[email protected]> (supplier of updated memlockd package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [email protected]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2022 07:24:13 +0800 Source: memlockd Architecture: source Version: 1.3-2.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Russell Coker <[email protected]> Changed-By: Paul Wise <[email protected]> Closes: 1000229 Changes: memlockd (1.3-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix package when building only arch-any packages (Closes: #1000229) Checksums-Sha1: e055e8183d432da174f0d5dba5ff5f58d1b51e82 1625 memlockd_1.3-2.1.dsc e8a45bfb1a6aa971174735730fabdb0a01672951 878 memlockd_1.3-2.1.diff.gz Checksums-Sha256: 611373a3e3b6a6cb7ce5213fb898fe556ae32f1c5caaacb6619d13ad07a219e2 1625 memlockd_1.3-2.1.dsc 362931fef399a5cc2dbf81b1ee93060ad2e7bf91b6a1d0af24bf0ac4746f5219 878 memlockd_1.3-2.1.diff.gz Files: 3dec84c8e9cd651428cf0b4e2a1f6df7 1625 admin optional memlockd_1.3-2.1.dsc c1ab97a5881734a0d5281bc04513c5a0 878 admin optional memlockd_1.3-2.1.diff.gz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEYQsotVz8/kXqG1Y7MRa6Xp/6aaMFAmIj9eYACgkQMRa6Xp/6 aaO/Qw//fPD3Pnzjk18JOnfTMwh1XleRJrcoYF8FUg82lVlaRAU9rRiiXDYVHVZk wzDjj97nRx34Jg+haPY99Kdrk0MgXd/3jgbcZCOJvQAmbyrTrfsJ4JIZbovXXbx+ EKMce5QtcScl4zvuSXAdZqaWZdY46sGCMyS7OP8VkhrK7QAUqj96kwr57kMMLz1d RmfwGCISkKxL1YElz9toCmyi5vGc+ymAfKVDgnjHbsH/Rxi0kcGucrRCPTp5wtUx bZ70Z9bg4VsklIZj2EzKUYF9F0DEIYEWtTbD0blLBsw8Mx+KW9TYN/tmjgIY0lX3 2eJUSwda9yWo3pFJV3hr3c4pVIw6+MO3nYDmmuht5J2mTYkCNQDEbprh5uX1hKRM x80rbrLeQXdpy9iFP2uC0Q7YynLG+GayXyIeKyziRpjiSOCUc49UPewi60Fcj+VR fKjmLXSO+9WWAV4PCuYwhXcMMq+RYm/N6D7T9JqfYnaoHXR4Jsbw23nDTwjvD/do UFRsBxiTdSfBqj/CWPyhDJMSCMy8ep/oFq/zIfRex7FhiB92iYMrcNa5J+Q2X5us FYfwV/XWra0f+pY0nBIBifhtA1Jd109jfLsjRZ0TdPeOhlcp/FUJawfhiiyRogXF MBADo1NGrifqAVuMjoB6g/JN8bv8nrgCXGeD67e7+/x7/C6IVq8= =6gJ5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
