Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2022 07:32:14 +0100
with message-id <Yi7hbidFThI6HUMD@pegase>
and subject line close 969847
has caused the Debian Bug report #969847,
regarding music123: autopkgtest should be marked superficial
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
969847: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969847
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: music123
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'music123' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package-tests.html
Examples of tests which are not significant includes (its not a
complete list):
1) Executing the binary to check version
Test-Command: foo -v
Test-Command: foo -V
Test-Command: foo --version
2) Executing the binary to check help (foo -h)
Test-Command: foo -h
Test-Command: foo --help
3) checking for files installed with 'ls'.
Test-Command: ls -l /usr/lib/*/foo.so
4) A Python or Perl library runs import foo or require Foo; but does
not attempt to use the library beyond that.
Test-Command: python3 -c "import foo"
Please add "Restrictions: superficial" to 'debian/tests/control' of
'music123'.
--
Sudip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello.
Version 16.6-2 in experimental now marks the test as superficial,
but I have forgotten to close the related bug in the changelog.
--- End Message ---
