Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2022 09:40:30 -0300
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1011342: Acknowledgement (mini-dinstall: 
install_permissions does not understand octal)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011342,
regarding mini-dinstall: install_permissions does not understand octal
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1011342: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011342
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mini-dinstall
Version: 0.7.0
Severity: normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I suspect (but did not verify) this is related to the port to python3.

The mini-dinstall docs say that the default value for incoming_permissions is 
0755. If you place

incoming_permissions = 0755

in .mini-dinstall it is interpreted as decimal, with fairly bizarre resulting 
permissions.
0o755 yields

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/mini-dinstall", line 252, in <module>
    incoming_permissions = configp.getint('DEFAULT', 'incoming_permissions')
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/configparser.py", line 818, in getint
    return self._get_conv(section, option, int, raw=raw, vars=vars,
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/configparser.py", line 808, in _get_conv
    return self._get(section, conv, option, raw=raw, vars=vars,
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/configparser.py", line 803, in _get
    return conv(self.get(section, option, **kwargs))
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '0o750'

As a workaround, I was able to enter

incoming_permissions = 488

which works, but is bit cryptic. In this specific case I could also
accept the defaults, I suppose.

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.17.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages mini-dinstall depends on:
ii  apt-utils    2.5.0
ii  python3      3.10.4-1+b1
ii  python3-apt  2.3.0+b1

Versions of packages mini-dinstall recommends:
ii  gpgv  2.2.35-2

Versions of packages mini-dinstall suggests:
ii  debian-keyring  2022.04.26

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=hq/3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> writes:

> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
>
> You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1011342: 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011342.
>
> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
> has been received.
>
> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
> interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
>
> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
>  Christoph Goehre <[email protected]>
>

Sorry, I see it's already fixed in testing.

d

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to