Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:19:39 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#962696: fixed in check-dfsg-status 1.31
has caused the Debian Bug report #962696,
regarding please consider renaming package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
962696: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962696
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: vrms

Hi,

Please consider changing the name of this package and removing the reference
to RMS. As the description says, the package isn't based on the opinions of
RMS, but on the DFSG. 

Thanks,

Ivo

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: check-dfsg-status
Source-Version: 1.31
Done: Holger Levsen <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
check-dfsg-status, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> (supplier of updated check-dfsg-status 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 14:13:11 +0200
Source: check-dfsg-status
Architecture: source
Version: 1.31
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian check-dfsg-status Maintainers 
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Holger Levsen <[email protected]>
Closes: 537941 962696
Changes:
 check-dfsg-status (1.31) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Upload to unstable.
   * Happy 29th birthday, Debian!
   * Dedicate this release to Rogério Brito. Many thanks for many
     contributions, for your kindness and everything, Rogério.
     (I have no idea what Rogério thought about renaming vrms.)
   * For more information about the package rename please refer to the 1.28,
     1.29 and 1.30 changelog entries below.
 .
 check-dfsg-status (1.30) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * d/control:
     - rename source package to check-dfsg-status, update Maintainer address
       accordingly.
     - update Homepage to reflect the new name.
 .
 vrms (1.29) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * d/control: update Vcs- headers to reflect repo rename on salsa.
   * explain vrms history in check-dfsg-status manpage.
   * provide manpage for vrms, thanks lintian.
   * d/changelog:
     - too long changelog line, thanks lintian.
     - use full names of Gunnar and Lars as done for Ivo too.
 .
 vrms (1.28) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Holger Levsen ]
   * Dedicate this release to Rogério Brito. Many thanks for many
     contributions, for your kindness and everything, Rogério.
     (I have no idea what Rogério thought about renaming vrms.)
   * Introduce new binary package, check-dfsg-status, to replace vrms (and
     soon src:vrms too). Closes: #962696 but not closing #985825 yet as this
     upload will go to experimental to prepare the transition there.
     Also closes: #537941.  The transitional vrms package only ships a link
     to /usr/bin/check-dfsg-status.
     As Lars Wirzenius wrote in
     
https://blog.liw.fi/posts/2021/03/29/the_leadership_problem_for_free_software/
     "We don’t need leaders with power, or with authority. We need thought
     leaders, who can persuade and convince people to do right things, and
     people who set good examples. We need many of them."
     Gunnar Wolf wrote in
     http://gwolf.org/2021/03/regarding-the-stallman-comeback.html
     "Again, the free software movement –and the world as a whole– owes a great
     deal to Stallman. He changed history. I admire his work, his persistence
     and his stubbornness. But I won’t have him represent me."
     And additionally I agree with Ivo de Decker in #962696 that the
     Debian DFSG compliancy checker should be not be called vrms, especially
     if that's not what it is/does as pointed out in #537941.
   * Update standards version to 4.6.1, no changes needed.
 .
   [ Debian Janitor ]
   * Move transitional package vrms to oldlibs/optional per policy 4.0.1.
Checksums-Sha1:
 910c7056e5b14568608f8a98dccd5c9bfc651782 1925 check-dfsg-status_1.31.dsc
 09d208f11d5ff20298fe9c0fb09a8f493d688087 13972 check-dfsg-status_1.31.tar.xz
 50cf3f47dbe3b51336362eb59320c045d2ae9576 5832 
check-dfsg-status_1.31_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 7d63d7a8b0b16f0b5136ae2eb1fe70d5dcf31b170117fb09bc5391bcba1c2961 1925 
check-dfsg-status_1.31.dsc
 74a8580cef3b490d7c4b9fa2bc6d430f96b6755cec4ff505d26dc54f12b9e06b 13972 
check-dfsg-status_1.31.tar.xz
 bb3c08997a92656aea4ae24e90dcd8f43b0580547e9f21cfebf0aaa393b00cdb 5832 
check-dfsg-status_1.31_source.buildinfo
Files:
 d050fb7e8a863cdc483e68f72dc886df 1925 admin optional check-dfsg-status_1.31.dsc
 88f113a2aa835eafd75ef6b1d5961d04 13972 admin optional 
check-dfsg-status_1.31.tar.xz
 8d594f15f07793860f3fdc776c5a9baa 5832 admin optional 
check-dfsg-status_1.31_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ogI0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to