Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2022 22:11:22 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1023560: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #985588,
regarding guile-2.2-libs: please re-enable slib catalog generation in postinst
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
985588: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985588
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: guile-2.2-libs
Version: 2.2.7+1-5.4
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

Dear Maintainer,

SLIB 3b6-3 in now supports Guile 2.2 (and 3.0 with a local patch in
Debian). Could you re-enable the code in postinst that generates the
catalog file? I've tested the following with guile-2.2:

Index: guile-2.2-2.2.7+1/debian/guile-libs.postinst
===================================================================
--- guile-2.2-2.2.7+1.orig/debian/guile-libs.postinst
+++ guile-2.2-2.2.7+1/debian/guile-libs.postinst
@@ -14,11 +14,9 @@ case "$1" in
         # Configure slib support.
         if test -d /usr/share/slib
         then
-          # Uncomment the code below whenever SLIB supports Guile 2.2.
-          echo "SLIB does not support Guile 2.2 yet.  Ignoring."
-          #(cd /usr/share/guile/@DEB_SRC_EFF_VER@ && ln -sf ../../slib .)
-          #/usr/lib/guile-@DEB_SRC_EFF_VER@/bin/guile -c \
-          #  "(use-modules (ice-9 slib)) (require 'new-catalog)"
+          (cd /usr/share/guile/@DEB_SRC_EFF_VER@ && ln -sf ../../slib .)
+          /usr/bin/guile-@DEB_SRC_EFF_VER@ -c \
+            "(use-modules (ice-9 slib)) (require 'new-catalog)"
         else
         # slib isn't installed -- clean up symlink.
           rm -f /usr/share/guile/@DEB_SRC_EFF_VER@/slib


An alternative is to have the slib package install a pre-generated
slibcat file for Guile under /var/lib/slib/. I've done this for a few
other Schemes in Debian that never supported slib before (MIT, Chez,
...). In that case the slib support code can be removed from Guile's
postinst.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages guile-2.2-libs depends on:
ii  libc6          2.31-5
ii  libcrypt1      1:4.4.17-1
ii  libffi7        3.3-5
ii  libgc1         1:8.0.4-3
ii  libgmp10       2:6.2.1+dfsg-1
ii  libltdl7       2.4.6-14
ii  libreadline8   8.1-1
ii  libunistring2  0.9.10-4

guile-2.2-libs recommends no packages.

guile-2.2-libs suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2.7+1-6+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package guile-2.2 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1023560

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to